Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Thin Ethernet Maximum Segment Length?


Outcoded
May 21st, 2002, 05:05 AM
OK, trivial question that's really bugging me:

I took my A+ Exam last week, one question asked the maximum length of 10Base-2. Answers included 185m and 200m. I said 185m, which was marked as correct.

I took an exam today for my degree which asked exactly the same question, multiple-choice, like the A+, but 185m was not there as an answer. I said 200m, which is what our lecturer has been saying throughout the course is correct. Now which is the true correct answer?

It doesn't bother me that much, but it's something I'd like to know. I was always taught that 185m was the official maximum.

I've tried the IEEE's site, and couldn't find the answer. What I really need is some official site I can quote to whip this lecturer's *** with.

Cheers folks.

MacGyver
May 21st, 2002, 06:11 AM
I did a google search and came up with both answers. In reality, the maximum length is approximate because there may be other factors involved that limit the length (magnetic fields, interference, etc) It's not likely that the exact maximum is a nice round number like 200.

But my personal opinion: who uses 10 base 2 these days, anyways? I hate the stuff!

Outcoded
May 21st, 2002, 12:45 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MacGyver:
<strong>I did a google search and came up with both answers. In reality, the maximum length is approximate because there may be other factors involved that limit the length (magnetic fields, interference, etc) It's not likely that the exact maximum is a nice round number like 200.

But my personal opinion: who uses 10 base 2 these days, anyways? I hate the stuff!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Know what you mean, damn easy to crimp though :D

I'm just looking for some sort of official standard to pi$$ of my lecturer (I'm cataloging the mistakes in the exam paper). Can't let these academics think they know everything <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

silencio
May 21st, 2002, 01:07 PM
Test makers must get paid by the question.

Ahcoraj
May 23rd, 2002, 07:13 AM
We just went over that Tues. in my MS2151a class, the official MS Curriculum says 185m, for whatever that's worth....Ive never even seen 10base 2 except maybe in highschool......

RejectionMan
May 23rd, 2002, 01:31 PM
N+, A+, MS, Cisco, Novel, all say 185. end of story, your prof is on crack

Outcoded
May 23rd, 2002, 02:00 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by RejectionMan:
<strong>N+, A+, MS, Cisco, Novel, all say 185. end of story, your prof is on crack</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nah, he's just spent too long in the 'real world'. You send an academic out there for a couple of years and it's like they were in 'Nam or summin <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

Him - "I personally put together this whole university's network. It's the biggest Novell network in Europe"

Me - "Yeah and every system runs 95 and crashes every 10 minutes - You must be well proud."
"

Ahcoraj
May 24th, 2002, 05:10 AM
My prof said it's not uncommon to hear 'them' round up to 200, but officially it's 185 and another guy in the class said he had a test where 200 was the closest choice so he took it and got it right....Go Figger......