http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1572143/
____________________________________________
http://forums.windrivers.com/images/.../2010/07/1.jpg
It is my pure and virtuous heart that
gives me the strength of ten!
Printable View
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle1572143/
____________________________________________
http://forums.windrivers.com/images/.../2010/07/1.jpg
It is my pure and virtuous heart that
gives me the strength of ten!
Old news:uke:
I kinda agree with this,view, but in another, i don't.
Should it really be up to the court to decide what it hears and what it won't hear? To me, a court should be impartial to what it is willing to hear, they are just just enforcing the law when there is a dispute between two parties.
What i think would be better is that if a lawsuite is dismissed with prejedice, the at fault party not only pays the other parties fees, but the court fee's also.
This kinda reminds me of this trial...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Chung
I hope this lady get's the same just deserts as the guy who started the legal battle in the link.
I agree wholeheartedly! I have the caveat that the attorneys should be tagged harshly for any lawsuit deemed "frivolous", as they are "professionals", and should be disbarred, or put on double secret probation if they are found to be habitually "incompetent". :)
nice, me liked~!
high quality mp3 Opeth