I'm amazed how little I actually know.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Back to the books, wish me luck folks.
Printable View
I'm amazed how little I actually know.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Back to the books, wish me luck folks.
Good luck to ya, let us know how it turns out...
Passed, going to pub, will post marks tommorrow.
Congrats. :D
Congrats to ya, Outcoded!!
congrats!
how are the new tests? I got mine before they became adaptive (mainly win3.1 with a little 95 for spice).
way to go!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Damned Angel:
<strong>congrats!
how are the new tests? I got mine before they became adaptive (mainly win3.1 with a little 95 for spice).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Pretty good, did them both in about half an hour (including a trip to the can.
The bias seemed to be towards 2k and 9x, with a bit of NT4.0 in. I tripped up a bit on some of the NT4.0 stuff, having not really used it that much, but didn't do bad anyway.
Just been checking some of the areas it recommends I brush up on.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Obtaining accurate descriptions of problems from customers </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">:confused:
Guessing electrodes was not the right answer then :D
Got 1063/1300 on the hardware and 864/1300 on the Operating Systems. How does that compare?