|
-
October 9th, 2000, 07:13 AM
#1
[RESOLVED] Post removed
-
October 9th, 2000, 10:04 AM
#2
Thanks for that Pogi!
------------------
Paint your old laptop!
-
October 25th, 2000, 02:54 PM
#3
You should also be able to attach a battery to one end and affix leds to the other end and test that way - quicker and easier. You could use two or three leds to test for crossover or a short.
Just a thought
-
October 28th, 2000, 09:11 PM
#4
uhh I was just wonder why you don't use two small hubs
seems to work just right
-
October 30th, 2000, 08:27 AM
#5
Melmo...can't afford to have two hubs lying around just to test a cable. Like I said, I'm a tightwad ;D.
-
October 30th, 2000, 03:44 PM
#6
two hubs will not neccessarily test correctly. I have had some strange errors regarding hubs, besides, hubs require a crossover cable for HUB to HUB communication, or a crossover port, two power outlets and desk space - you also have to go to two different locations to check if your drops are good. With a loopback it fits in your toolkit, uses batteries, can be used to test cable drops and jacks, and you can test from one end.
-
November 1st, 2000, 01:10 PM
#7
Very good details, i am going to try this out
------------------
We may be through with the past, but the past is not through with us.
-
November 1st, 2000, 08:16 PM
#8
Registered User
Originally posted by melmo:
uhh I was just wonder why you don't use two small hubs
seems to work just right
how would you test to see if a crossover worked? you would need atleast one of the hubs to have an uplink port than. Plus, whats the fun in that? You don't get to tinker with anything and isn't that what we're all about, tinkering in our spare time to see if we can make the microsoft operating systems run. its like trying to make a harley run
-
November 2nd, 2000, 10:19 AM
#9
-
November 2nd, 2000, 12:35 PM
#10
Originally posted by u8drtsox:
My only thought here is if you're a tight xxx why did you buy an Ohm meter? Now I have to go to Radio Shack.....Just can't ask the staff for any help. Where do they find those people???
The ohmmeter was a Christmas present (so my tightwad reputation is intact). As far as the comment about the staff at Radio Shack...that's why I gave the part number for the blocks in my original post 
[This message has been edited by Pogi (edited November 02, 2000).]
-
November 17th, 2000, 06:36 PM
#11
You know if you take your pay rate and multiply it by the time it took you to buy and build your cheapometer and spent that time working you might find that you could have bought one and have had a few $ extra and a lot of extra time as well?
I just wanted to point out that being cheap can actually cost you more in time that it is worth.
-
January 11th, 2001, 08:01 AM
#12
Talk about Radio Shack staff??!! I just did a search on Radio Shack's website for the White surface mount jack and it came up as a telephone extension cord, 25 ft. to be exact! Oh, well... at least it is still white! BTW, the code number is still good for the ivory one (at least for now).
-
January 11th, 2001, 09:32 AM
#13
Paladin Tools has a nice little multi-cable tester that runs about $100 at Fry's. Sure, it's a bit much, but it tests coax, RJ-45, RJ-11, RJ-12, USB, DB-9, DB-15, DB-15HD, DB-25, and Centronics-36. And it can test any combination of these (like this weird DB-25 to RJ-45 cable) It not only tells you if the cable is good, but what the wiring pattern is. (Very handy around here, since we use 5 different types of RJ-45 cables) They also have a Mac version, as well as adaptors for testing IDE, SCSI, and other cables, but I haven't seen these in Fry's.
Expensive, but it's paid for itself already.
------------------
Captain Troy D. Pack Rat
`akbar Press
If you're furry and you know it, hug the mouse!
-
January 13th, 2001, 01:27 PM
#14
my you don't just has some old 4 or 5 port 10 base hubs lying around doing nothing ??
-
January 15th, 2001, 11:08 AM
#15
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Geneva, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ilovetheusers:
You know if you take your pay rate and multiply it by the time it took you to buy and build your cheapometer and spent that time working you might find that you could have bought one and have had a few $ extra and a lot of extra time as well?
I just wanted to point out that being cheap can actually cost you more in time that it is worth. </font>
I apply this rule to all situations in my work. Example: screw around for 5 hours with a crummy component, or replace the component with something decent. Give the customer these two options with the cost for each, and your life becomes much easier. And the customer is informed.
I saw a cool tester that the tech who wired our office had: it had an LCD display and would test the line to see if it was good for 100 megabit network.
------------------
If it ain't broke, and you try to fix it anyway, then it WILL need fixing!
[This message has been edited by MacGyver (edited January 15, 2001).]
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks