Passwords in XP
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Passwords in XP

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Fountain Valley, CA
    Posts
    507

    Post Passwords in XP

    I'm realizing that XP doesn't like it when you use null passwords. I have one customer with a peer to peer network, with an xp pro machine as the "server". i made user accounts on the server so that everyone could access the files. (oh yeah by the way, you have to have user accounts specified on the xp box if 98 clients are going to access it.)

    it seemed to be working fine, but then the other day one of the 98 clients stopped being able to access the server. the password was blank, so i changed it to his first name, and then it worked like usual.

    just thought i'd pass that on, maybe save someone the moments of head scratching that i went though.

  2. #2
    Registered User AlienDyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,772

    Post

    I think it would be better if this topic was on the Tech Tips forum.

    Thanks!
    The wandering Odysseus of the web.

  3. #3
    Registered User WebHead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,208

    Post

    Hey tk421,
    Just a couple of thoughts. First of all, on a P2P network, there is no server. Second of all, I thought XP (Pro or Home) was a client OS which means you can't make user accounts for any machine other than the machine that XP is installed on. Anyway, this is why your server is not working properly. Yes, you can use any OS you want as a server, but if you want a real, secure, server,... then you should install a server OS such as Windows 2000 Server. Otherwise, if you're just dedicated to a P2P network, then you have no server, which essentially ends all discussion on this topic. I hope that makes sense to you.
    Hello World

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Fountain Valley, CA
    Posts
    507

    Post

    that's why i said "server". besides, a server by definition is a machine that provides a service to the network. so in that sense it IS a server, since it provides a data center to the entire network. regardless of whether it is using a true server os.

    the reason that i wrote the post was because i thought it interesting that you had to create user accounts for users accessing the xp machine. i thought that was unnecessary as well. turns out it isn't.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Infront of my computer
    Posts
    174

    Post

    Windows XP sucks !!!! I love Windows 2000 =)
    WARNING
    :: I am NOT held responsible for any damages on your coumputer. ::

  6. #6
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by Randolph:
    <strong>Windows XP sucks !!!! I love Windows 2000 =) </strong><hr></blockquote>

    Blasphemer!
    Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. -Douglas Adams

  7. #7
    Registered User +Daemon+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    RC, Ca
    Posts
    3,406

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by WebHead:
    <strong>Hey tk421,
    Just a couple of thoughts. First of all, on a P2P network, there is no server. Second of all, I thought XP (Pro or Home) was a client OS which means you can't make user accounts for any machine other than the machine that XP is installed on. Anyway, this is why your server is not working properly. Yes, you can use any OS you want as a server, but if you want a real, secure, server,... then you should install a server OS such as Windows 2000 Server. Otherwise, if you're just dedicated to a P2P network, then you have no server, which essentially ends all discussion on this topic. I hope that makes sense to you. </strong><hr></blockquote>

    peer to peer
    ============

    There must be a server and a client or how could there be peer to peer? Just that all systems are the server and the client thats all.

    Windows Xp Pro if you add it to a domain it will work just like Windows 2000 Pro. Adding users, adding security to olders and files.

    Oh but if you want a secure server Windows will not work im sorry

  8. #8
    Registered User Darren Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    859

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by tk421:
    <strong>that's why i said "server". besides, a the reason that i wrote the post was because i thought it interesting that you had to create user accounts for users accessing the xp machine. i thought that was unnecessary as well. turns out it isn't.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    you have to do the same under Win2K as well unless you turn on the 'Guest' account (which you can do in XP also).
    Darren Wilson is the ....... MONKEY HUNTER..... Coming to a big screen near you soon!!!

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Portland, OR , USA
    Posts
    37

    Post

    There are a few settings you have to change in XP in order to allow "anonymous" clients to connect. Enable the guest account, and set the password to null (click set password on guest and hit ok without typing). In user right assignments change "Deny access to computer from network" and remove the Guest entry. Lastly, in security options, change "Network access: Let Everyone permissions apply to anonymous users" to enabled.

    Also note, that if your client machine is on 9x and is logged in with a username that exists on the XP machine, then it will fail unless the passwords match too. On NT/2k/XP it will simply ask for a different user/pass. Put in anything, and it will revert to anonymous.

    One more thing, I'm sure some of you do know this, but local security policies in NTFS files take precedence(?) over network sharing. So if you have everyone is able to read on network sharing, but you have local security securiity set so "everyone" cannot access, then it wont work.

    Sorry for the long post.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Fountain Valley, CA
    Posts
    507

    Post

    thanks, that is good info.

  11. #11
    Registered User Mr_Miyagi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Westbury, Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    1,099

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by tk421:
    <strong>that's why i said "server". besides, a server by definition is a machine that provides a service to the network. so in that sense it IS a server, since it provides a data center to the entire network. regardless of whether it is using a true server os.

    the reason that i wrote the post was because i thought it interesting that you had to create user accounts for users accessing the xp machine. i thought that was unnecessary as well. turns out it isn't.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">same for 2k too! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
    Mr Miyagi, by any other name... (is this sig short enough?)

  12. #12
    Registered User Gollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan US of A
    Posts
    2,383

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Darren Wilson:
    <strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by tk421:
    <strong>that's why i said "server". besides, a the reason that i wrote the post was because i thought it interesting that you had to create user accounts for users accessing the xp machine. i thought that was unnecessary as well. turns out it isn't.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">you have to do the same under Win2K as well unless you turn on the 'Guest' account (which you can do in XP also).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Wanna know what really blows though? You can't access the document settings, program files or windows folders in either xp home or pro even if you have the same user or password. It sucks.
    "I feel like one of those mass murderers on death row. I never understood how the hell they got more chicks than I did. Now I know. They sold crap on eBay." -- Anonymous ebayer

    "I figured out what's wrong with life: it's other people." -- Dilbert

  13. #13
    Registered User Cygnus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL
    Posts
    491

    Post

    I run a P2P network at home similar to this (im on it right now). I havent had any problems with users accessing the files on the XP machine and I use it for file storage from the other machines as well.

    Hmmm...
    I dont feel tardy...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •