[RESOLVED] command.com copyrighted?
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: [RESOLVED] command.com copyrighted?

  1. #1
    Raze
    Guest

    Resolved [RESOLVED] command.com copyrighted?

    Just read in the paper that a company here has been taken to court by Microsoft for piracy...it said that they were loading pc's with command.com...in other words just making them bootable...

    how else are we supposed to help our customers? i usually make the pc bootable and load the cdrom drivers so the enduser just sticks in his win9x cd and types setup from the cd...

    is there another file like from another manufacturer that we could use that supports fat32 and windows will install over without hiccups and that isnt copyrighted?

    btw...ive seen on the ontrack disk managers from seagate etc...that they have bootable files from caldera and another from pcdos...think those would work?

    appreciate....thanks in advance...

  2. #2
    Registered User Gabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Tel Aviv Israel
    Posts
    2,161

    Post

    Caledra and PCDos (and also FreeDOS)
    Willl Do the Trick
    I will suggest that you will Install a OS/Program to your customers only with a Valid License.
    Real stupidity beats Artifical Intelligence
    Avatar courtesy of A D E P T

  3. #3
    Intel Mod Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,783

    Post

    Unfortunately, Caldera are no longer offering OpenDOS as a free operating system.

    It was originally DR-DOS, and was passed off to a company called Lineo, who have re-instated it as embedded DR-DOS.

    See: http://www.caldera.com/company/drdos.html

    And: http://www.drdos.com/

    FreeDOS is a possibility: http://www.freedos.org/

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Sunderland, North East of England
    Posts
    423

    Cool

    Surely if you own a Windows 95 disk, and put on the command.com from the win 95 boot disk, that would be OK???

    Microsoft are taking this piracy thing too far. How the hell is putting command.com onto a machine causing them to loose money?
    Good day to be alive, sir
    Good day to be alive he says, yeah

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    1,639

    Post

    Im pretty much beyond giving a rats @ss about piracy anymore.

    People record TV shows with their VCR's, and that aint quite kosher, but whos pisses their pants over that?
    [email protected]

    http://forum.hot4s.com.au - Hot 4's & Performance cars

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Sunderland, North East of England
    Posts
    423

    Post

    In Britain, it is legal to record from the TV, but the recording must be destroyed with a limited time otherwise you are in bretch of copyright.

    The same applies for radio, I think.

    Personally I've never been raided and don't think I will be. Anyone who has copied a tape or music CD for someone is braking the law, so what do I care.

    My argument for software (in particular Windows) is that why pay for something that doesn't work.
    Good day to be alive, sir
    Good day to be alive he says, yeah

  7. #7
    Registered User AlienDyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,772

    Post

    If loading command.com is illegal too, then I should start leaving the drives as they are. Without anything on!
    The wandering Odysseus of the web.

  8. #8
    Senior Member condor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    878

    Post

    as long as you own a license for an o/s (win9x) you are allowed to create a floppy or install it's DOS on your HDD..

    if a user buys a computer with no O/S you are not allowed to put Any copyrighted o/s on it..


    you want it to boot ? install linux..

    you can also call Microsoft and ask them for help - as far as I know if you sell computers you are allowed to install any O/S on them for QA, but when you give it to the use he must have a license or you must remove the O/S from the computer..

    command.com is a part of an O/S ..

  9. #9
    Registered User Gabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Tel Aviv Israel
    Posts
    2,161

    Question

    I wonder if Formatting a Drive using Command.com (with no "/s" switch) would be illigel too.
    Real stupidity beats Artifical Intelligence
    Avatar courtesy of A D E P T

  10. #10
    Registered User techs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    In one of the really, really Blue states.
    Posts
    5,159

    Post

    I wonder when the copyright to command.com runs out?
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." -Benjamin Franklin
    "I'm a hard worker." -George W. Bush

  11. #11
    Intel Mod Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,783

    Post

    As far as I know, the intellectual property rights for software are the same as for other "written" property like books, which is the life of the author plus seventy years. At that rate command.com will be mighty obsolete by the time it becomes public domain.

    I expect Microsoft is acting to prevent licenced code from being sent out on machines sold without any O/S, in which case the H/D would have to be empty, or have a freely licenced O/S like FreeDOS or Linux.

    Microsoft would naturally assume systems sold without an O/S will be loaded with either a competing O/S or an illegal Windows by the owner.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    1,965

    Post

    Originally posted by Gabriel:
    <STRONG>I wonder if Formatting a Drive using Command.com (with no "/s" switch) would be illigel too.</STRONG>
    I don't believe that it would be since you are not installing system files, but I'm not 100%sure

  13. #13
    Registered User sdrawkcab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    240

    Post

    Originally posted by AlienDyne:
    <STRONG>If loading command.com is illegal too, then I should start leaving the drives as they are. Without anything on!</STRONG>
    So is it also illegal to use FDISK /MBR without the license? You are writing M$ code to the Boot record, and you're not paying them for it. I wouldn't be surprised to see this one in court soon.
    ---
    Back with a vengeance.
    ---
    Try Windows Vista, the CE.ME.NT eXPerience...

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    125

    Arrow

    M$ is going too far with this one. Where can you buy a copy of command.com anyway? I mean if they sold it, then that woudl be one thing. But to bitch about someone stealing something that you dont even sell is going too far. I hope they lose.
    I'm just a sinner saved by grace.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    19

    Angry

    If they like it like that, then I'll happily go for Linux or Apple. Apple is also cool.

    It's not that we're really good, it's just that everyone else sucks...
    It's not that we're really good, it's just that everyone else sucks...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •