Microsoft trying to get rid of TCP/IP for their own protocol?
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Microsoft trying to get rid of TCP/IP for their own protocol?

  1. #1
    Registered User BurnFEST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    603

    Post Microsoft trying to get rid of TCP/IP for their own protocol?

    <a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010802.html" target="_blank">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010802.html</a>

    Read that article...some VERY interesting reading...

    What u think, is it possible?

    Burn.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    125

    Post

    knowing what Microsoft have done in the past (IE), anything is possible....

    but imagine the court cases against them.....
    I'd be the village idiot, but that spot is already taken.

    Note to self: No-one cares about your system specs

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    125

    Post

    they wouldn't do it, because it would be the start of many court cases against them (antitrust and all)
    I'd be the village idiot, but that spot is already taken.

    Note to self: No-one cares about your system specs

  4. #4
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120

    Post

    I doubt that Microsoft's protocol would ain any kinf of official recognition from UNIX users throughout the planet.

    Sounds more like propaganda, again, from the copyright holders of FUD
    Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. -Douglas Adams

  5. #5
    Senior Member Garak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Hebburn, Tyne & Wear, North East England
    Posts
    2,448

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by Deanodriver:
    <strong>knowing what Microsoft have done in the past (IE), anything is possible....

    but imagine the court cases against them.....</strong><hr></blockquote>

    lol, ie, guess there was no pun intended... good one deanodriver....
    All sorts of wonderful things in life.

  6. #6
    Registered User BurnFEST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    603

    Post

    LOL.....i didnt even notice it, and i reckon deano didnt either...

    Burn.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    The Rat's Nest, Vista, CA, USA
    Posts
    525

    Post

    Microsoft HAD their own protocol, NetBEUI, which they barely even support anymore. They dropped it in favor of TCP/IP. I highly doubt they would be crazy enough to try to introduce a new protocol. And I think Microsoft would start seeing organised resistance to it. After all, AOL, like it or not, is a major player in the Internet world, and considering that I've heard rumors of them creating their own OS, I highly doubt they'd be willing to follow Microsoft any more than they have to.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    your mind
    Posts
    78

    Post

    If M$ makes a protocol that will automatically make someone's machine self destruct when they try to DDoS someone else, I'll support it.
    w00t

  9. #9
    Registered User BurnFEST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    603

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by JWW:
    <strong>If M$ makes a protocol that will automatically make someone's machine self destruct when they try to DDoS someone else, I'll support it. </strong><hr></blockquote>

    Sounds like a good idea to me!! Bloody DDoSers

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    125

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by Garak:
    <strong>

    lol, ie, guess there was no pun intended... good one deanodriver.... </strong><hr></blockquote>

    oh, yeah, cool

    hehe

    Dean
    I'd be the village idiot, but that spot is already taken.

    Note to self: No-one cares about your system specs

  11. #11
    Registered User PuterGeekGirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Corky's Cave
    Posts
    2,348

    Post

    Yep DDos'ers should be SHOT
    Failure is not an option -- its a "feature" of Windows.

    Mama never told me geekhood was gonna be like this....

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    83

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by Captain Packrat:
    <strong>Microsoft HAD their own protocol, NetBEUI, which they barely even support anymore. They dropped it in favor of TCP/IP. I highly doubt they would be crazy enough to try to introduce a new protocol. And I think Microsoft would start seeing organised resistance to it. After all, AOL, like it or not, is a major player in the Internet world, and considering that I've heard rumors of them creating their own OS, I highly doubt they'd be willing to follow Microsoft any more than they have to.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    They've gone one step further now then that. Netbeui is GONE from Windows XP. The protocol de-installs itself when upgrade from a previous OS. Its strange why they would do this, then again netbeui does absolutly nothing. Any idiot can setup it up. Ohh, wait a minute. That is the point. Nevermind.
    He who can laugh at himself will never cease to be amused.

  13. #13
    Registered User BurnFEST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    603

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by PuterGeekGirl:
    <strong>Yep DDos'ers should be SHOT</strong><hr></blockquote>
    No...shooting them would be too quick and painless....

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    LocalHost
    Posts
    762

    Post

    Only reason why they dont want TCP/IP anymore is kinda in the same boat as USB 2.0, THEY CANT GET THERE SOFTWARE TO WORK RIGHT ON IT. The security and exploits they get they cant stop. So they think they can come out with another standard which will make it 60% more deadly than what tcp/ip is now for Microsoft's Products. This is the same for USB, it failed the first time they showed the public and it still fails, USB is for macs and they cant get usb to work right.
    http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...uts/athlon.gif

    Do you leak any fluids, do you have any bumps on your rear, do you have any unpleasant odors?
    If you answered yes to any of these then you are not qualified to own a new AMD ATHLON XP.
    If someone ask you if you are running the all-new fastest AMD ATHLON XP, just turn around and reply "WHY YES, AND ITS CERTIFIED"

    http://www.daemonprojects.com/

  15. #15
    Driver Terrier NooNoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    31,824

    Post

    I wonder, the paranoid side of me agrees with every word - marketing people are sneaky!

    However, having published that article, if it comes to fruition, that article will be held up in court as a huge "told you so!".

    I sincerely hope that Gates and Co remember that diversity allows for growth, whereas monopolies on the whole stagnate.

    Or, is Bill Gates a communist? I mean, he seems to want everyone to have exactly the same operating system in every household!
    Never, ever approach a computer saying or even thinking "I will just do this quickly."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •