fdisk
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: fdisk

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Duluth, MN U. S.A.
    Posts
    2,352

    fdisk

    Anyone know if there is a limit with the old fdisk command? On larger drives it won't see the whole drive. I know about the 137gb limit and all but I just tried to install an 80 gb on a computer running win98se and it saw it as a 10gb. I was able to use software ( ezbios ) to get around this but I thought 98se could support right up to the 137 gb limit? Other cases where I've seen this it's because the computer didn't recognize the hard drive but in this case the computer is seeing it as an 80 gb. Any one have any ideas what's up? i looked on MS website but all they talk about is how fat32 supports up to 2 terabytes and all that crap.
    Don't hate me because I'm a US citizen!

  2. #2
    Tech-To-Tech Mod kato2274's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Bentleyville, Pa
    Posts
    2,317
    Quote Originally Posted by Shard92
    Anyone know if there is a limit with the old fdisk command? On larger drives it won't see the whole drive. I know about the 137gb limit and all but I just tried to install an 80 gb on a computer running win98se and it saw it as a 10gb. I was able to use software ( ezbios ) to get around this but I thought 98se could support right up to the 137 gb limit? Other cases where I've seen this it's because the computer didn't recognize the hard drive but in this case the computer is seeing it as an 80 gb. Any one have any ideas what's up? i looked on MS website but all they talk about is how fat32 supports up to 2 terabytes and all that crap.
    fdisk? you're still using that? you gotta get yourself a copy of partition magic or at the very least get all the setup disks from the drive makers. I save almost 20-30 minutes every time I use one of those options as opposed to fdisk.
    Nonsense prevails, modesty fails
    Grace and virtue turn into stupidity - E. Costello

  3. #3
    Registered User arch0nmyc0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    It's all relative.
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by kato2274
    fdisk? you're still using that? you gotta get yourself a copy of partition magic or at the very least get all the setup disks from the drive makers. I save almost 20-30 minutes every time I use one of those options as opposed to fdisk.
    Or you could use Free FDisk and eliminate the "Verifying drive intergrity" and it takes all of 10 seconds and a reboot...

    http://www.23cc.com/free-fdisk/

    I believe that is the site where I got it from. It should also have a link to the Free Format I use that allows quick formats on newly partitioned drives...
    Last edited by arch0nmyc0n; November 20th, 2003 at 06:46 PM.
    "We must always fear the wicked. But there is another kind of evil that we must fear the most, and that is the indifference of good men." -- Monsignor; The Boondock Saints.

  4. #4
    Registered User shamus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cornish,Maine,USA
    Posts
    3,140
    Quote Originally Posted by arch0nmyc0n
    Or you could use Free FDisk and eliminate the "Verifying drive intergrity" and it takes all of 10 seconds and a reboot...

    http://www.23cc.com/free-fdisk/

    I believe that is the site where I got it from. It should also have a link to the Free Format I use that allows quick formats on newly partitioned drives...
    Thanks!

  5. #5
    Registered User Rô©kHøµñÐ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Barstow, CA
    Posts
    114
    You could use a linux boot CD like gentoo or knoppix and really knock time off the format time. It is also free.

  6. #6
    Registered User Bigdog632's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    yorktown VA USA
    Posts
    26
    you could check the bios also updating it may help with the hard drive issue i have seen a few older systems that wouldnt detect the bigger drives due to their bios but they were very old(in computer years)

  7. #7
    Registered User 3D Prophet III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    From gaseous clouds forming around Uranus
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by Shard92
    Anyone know if there is a limit with the old fdisk command? On larger drives it won't see the whole drive. I know about the 137gb limit and all but I just tried to install an 80 gb on a computer running win98se and it saw it as a 10gb. I was able to use software ( ezbios ) to get around this but I thought 98se could support right up to the 137 gb limit? Other cases where I've seen this it's because the computer didn't recognize the hard drive but in this case the computer is seeing it as an 80 gb. Any one have any ideas what's up? i looked on MS website but all they talk about is how fat32 supports up to 2 terabytes and all that crap.
    Win98se only supports up to 64gb, but you can get the fix and explaination here.


    http://support.microsoft.com/default...44&Product=w98
    "Oh my beloved Ice Cream Bar, how I love to lick your creamy center" - Ren

  8. #8
    Intel Mod Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,783
    G'day 3D Prophet, nice to see you around!

    I believe the FDISK from WinME will do the trick too.

  9. #9
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by 3D Prophet III
    Win98se only supports up to 64gb, but you can get the fix and explaination here.


    http://support.microsoft.com/default...44&Product=w98
    Don't forget with this that 'format' is still 'wrong' too (exactly the same cause) .. it does however 'work' correctly even if some of what it says while working is wrong ... Format Displays Size of Partitions or Logical Drives Larger Than 64 GB Incorrectly - 263045

    BTW there's a 'good' reason why FDisk is sooooo sloooooow, it does a sector by sector check, none of the 'other' methods do, you may or may not consider this 'necessary', if you have any 'slight' disk imperfections FDisk is more likely to find & avoid them (mapping them out of ordinary usage) doing this, than other methods will ... however it is slooooooow, but with good reason.

  10. #10
    Registered User arch0nmyc0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    It's all relative.
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by confus-ed
    BTW there's a 'good' reason why FDisk is sooooo sloooooow, it does a sector by sector check, none of the 'other' methods do, you may or may not consider this 'necessary', if you have any 'slight' disk imperfections FDisk is more likely to find & avoid them (mapping them out of ordinary usage) doing this, than other methods will ... however it is slooooooow, but with good reason.
    True, and on older drives where I suspect or know of problems I do use the "normal" fdisk and format (or the manufacturers disk) to make sure everything is found. However, I trust new drives quite a bit more than old ones. So the way I do it, it takes (depending on reboot time) about 30 seconds. May not be as safe as you say I haven't checked the surface properly, but I've never really run into a problem yet.
    "We must always fear the wicked. But there is another kind of evil that we must fear the most, and that is the indifference of good men." -- Monsignor; The Boondock Saints.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Duluth, MN U. S.A.
    Posts
    2,352
    Thanks all I remember hearing about the 64 gb limit but that was about it. And like I said when I searched MS website I couldn't find anything about it.
    Don't hate me because I'm a US citizen!

  12. #12
    Registered User orkalass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6
    First off, the 137GB max you were talking about was with the old IDE controllers and has nothing to do with ANY program's incompatibility. Secondly, as they said, as long as windows recognizes your disk being its full size, then fdisk will too. It might not say it but it will format the entire thing. Secondly, if you wanna format your non-windows partition in windows, just use Computer Management to do it.

  13. #13
    Banned Ya_know's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,692
    Quote Originally Posted by orkalass
    First off, the 137GB max you were talking about was with the old IDE controllers and has nothing to do with ANY program's incompatibility. .
    Are you sure you know what you are talking about?

    How to Enable 48-bit Logical Block Addressing Support for ATAPI Disk Drives in Windows XP

    http://www.seagate.com/support/kb/disc/tp/137gb.pdf

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Duluth, MN U. S.A.
    Posts
    2,352
    Quote Originally Posted by orkalass
    First off, the 137GB max you were talking about was with the old IDE controllers and has nothing to do with ANY program's incompatibility. Secondly, as they said, as long as windows recognizes your disk being its full size, then fdisk will too. It might not say it but it will format the entire thing. Secondly, if you wanna format your non-windows partition in windows, just use Computer Management to do it.
    Well you are part right. You can get a card to handle the hd but, xp needs sp1 to support larger disks and win2000 needs sp3. Also as was said windows 98 fdisk will only fdisk 64 gb without getting the "patch" ( actually a replacement for fdisk program. ). Yes format will format the whole thing.... as long is it is partitioned correctly....( ie new fdisk command ). Oh and what do you mean non-windows partition? and it's also hard to use computer management from a boot disk.

    Oh for those wondering we used datalifeguardv11 from western digital to format the disk. then transfer their existing windows to the new disk.
    Don't hate me because I'm a US citizen!

  15. #15
    Registered User BIGGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Compton
    Posts
    132
    i used a copy of fdisk to fdisk my 160gb raid array, even though it didnt report it being the right size it still worked, then i did a full format on it and everything was a o k

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •