802.11a,b,g
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: 802.11a,b,g

  1. #1
    Banned raul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    you can't pronounce it
    Posts
    271

    802.11a,b,g

    waht is the difference between 802.11a, b,g???

  2. #2
    Registered User Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,224
    http://802.11abg.rtx.dk/
    802.11b is currently the most widespread standard, and can transfer data wirelessly at a speed of 5.5 Mbit/s within a range of 50–100 metres.

    802.11a is four times faster than 802.11b, providing a speed of 27 Mbit/s and a range of 20–100 metres.

    802.11g is the latest standard and is just as fast as 802.11a, but operates on the 2.4 GHz frequency band.

  3. #3
    Banned raul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    you can't pronounce it
    Posts
    271
    which do i choose for long range and with obstruction ????



    Quote Originally Posted by Archer

  4. #4
    Registered User Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,224
    How long i.e. are we talking tens of meters or miles and what sort of obstruction i.e. metalised walls can cause problems?

  5. #5
    Banned raul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    you can't pronounce it
    Posts
    271
    5km and some power lines ....


    Quote Originally Posted by Archer
    How long i.e. are we talking tens of meters or miles and what sort of obstruction i.e. metalised walls can cause problems?

  6. #6
    Registered User Gollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan US of A
    Posts
    2,383
    I don't trust G yet. It's to new and if I'm not mistaken it is not an official standard yet (almost but not quite). I'd use A if you need bandwith and B if all's you want is to share internet or lite file sharing. Just make sure that when you buy antennas that they are for said standard as A is in the 5ghz range and B,G are in the 2.4ghz range. You will probably have fewer interference problems with A as well as the 2.4ghz range is saturated with other ap's, cordless phones and microwaves etc. Also keep in mind that you will need to keep your fresnal zone open as well as LOS (google the terms if you are not familiar with them). Good luck.
    "I feel like one of those mass murderers on death row. I never understood how the hell they got more chicks than I did. Now I know. They sold crap on eBay." -- Anonymous ebayer

    "I figured out what's wrong with life: it's other people." -- Dilbert

  7. #7
    Registered User TechZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bahrain, Middle East
    Posts
    7,525
    the usrobotics (or 3Com) 802.11g claims 100mbps in ideal situations and from what i've read it can almost reach that speed, at least better than the 54mbps other G models out there

  8. #8
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by raul
    5km and some power lines ....
    Well none of the above ! All those standards are about 'inside' really .. they've just bumped the figures on b & g class wireless ranges to reflect what you can achieve in ideal/good conditions

    The problem over a distance of 5km is the potential interferance on public bands
    802.11a operates on the licencefree 5 GHz frequency band, while the others use the 2.4 GHz band. So what you get is just like when you are listening to your favourite local radio show near the edge of its 'hot transmission' area, where you get the local pizza delivery or Taxi firm cutting in ..

    At 5km you've got to start thinking satellite & the like & loads more money, unless you have a pair of very tall buildings & not too much in between, & I'd say some high voltage power lines in line of sight will produce some 'interesting' levels of interferance ..

  9. #9
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120
    I'd like to add to what Cnfus-ed responded by sayint that if line of sight is available, then microwave solutions also exist.

    The only problem you will have in reaching a 5Km target is quite simply cost.

    We're talking a lot of money here, compared to the 802.11x solutions you were looking into.

    It may be simpler just to setup a VPN or a dedicated line between the two points.
    Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. -Douglas Adams

  10. #10
    Registered User TechZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bahrain, Middle East
    Posts
    7,525
    i read in teh paper, a guy just spent $5 on making his wifi connection go 5km,

  11. #11
    Banned raul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    you can't pronounce it
    Posts
    271
    now im confused... as far i know... i would cost me more than $2000
    to buy those smartbridges...that can go 5km


    Quote Originally Posted by TechZ
    i read in teh paper, a guy just spent $5 on making his wifi connection go 5km,

  12. #12
    Registered User TechZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bahrain, Middle East
    Posts
    7,525
    4km WiFi Range w/ $5 DIY Antenna - This industrious fellow in New Zealand made his own WiFi antenna using a USB WiFi adapter and a Chinese 'spider skimmer mesh scoop.' He got about 17 dB signal improvement for about US $5 in materials.
    http://www.stanford.edu/~jstockdl/tm....orcon.net.nz/

  13. #13
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by TechZ
    [b]4km WiFi Range w/ $5 DIY Antenna
    , but have to have a try though, high voltage cables are a hell of an interference zone in our line of sight, I can't get digital telly at my house because of some well over 500m away.. I reckon though those numbers are still 'ideal' conditions, then you've got waterproofing yada yada
    ..so in best military tradition we ran a few LOS(Line Of Sight) scouting trials,supporting the USB device on a broom handle tied to the roof,fed by ~5m of regular el cheapo USB cable from an XP laptop running the new NS 0.4 inside. As always LOS means just that at 2.4GHz, & assorted in line trees & buildings caused massive signal losses, so ~100m was all we managed while walking around the house/yard/street with a Dell Axim PDA & a Socket low power CF WiFi card.
    The guys on that link are busy stealing other folks open wi-fi signals, so what they call 'connected' & what I call connected reliably will be two different things .. but you never know

  14. #14
    Registered User TechZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Bahrain, Middle East
    Posts
    7,525
    What aout Wi Max, Intel's wireless solution?

  15. #15
    Banned raul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    you can't pronounce it
    Posts
    271
    maybe u could give me more info on it???

    Quote Originally Posted by TechZ
    What aout Wi Max, Intel's wireless solution?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •