-
August 3rd, 2005, 12:20 AM
#1
Registered User
Windows XP Firewall vs. ZoneAlarm Pro Firewall
So, I just broke down and installed Windows XP, and I must admit that it seems faster than Windows 2000.
The question is: Do I continue using ZoneAlarm Pro Firewall, or do I use the built-in Windows XP Firewall ??
Any pros and cons to either ??
TIA
MadDog
-
August 3rd, 2005, 03:03 AM
#2
Registered User
WinXP's firewall only blocks inbound packets, and in itself has a few limitations, if you are a ZoneAlarm Pro user (as I am), then I'd say continue using it, its very good IMO, and has loads more features than the built-in firewall of WinXP.
-
August 3rd, 2005, 04:54 PM
#3
Registered User
-
August 5th, 2005, 04:56 AM
#4
Geezer
-
August 5th, 2005, 06:45 AM
#5
Registered User
For those who want a firewall, other than the XP one, I setup ZoneAlarm free for them, and quite a few of them are happy with it.
-
September 2nd, 2005, 08:12 PM
#6
Registered User
Personally, I am a firm believer in a hardware solution for this, as software can be broken. If running DSL/Cable (always on conection), a router, set up properly, ought to be enough. Just check your logs. If you are running a DSL/Cable connnection without a router you're asking for trouble in the first place, so why would you need a software solution? Just my 2 cents.
-
September 3rd, 2005, 06:31 AM
#7
Geezer
Originally Posted by DaveW
Personally, I am a firm believer in a hardware solution for this, as software can be broken. If running DSL/Cable (always on conection), a router, set up properly, ought to be enough. .
A home router won't & can't protect you from an 'illegal' software process activating a valid port range, for that you need either a local whilelisting service which can identify the process, or something much more sophisticated (firewall wise, as a router isn't really doing that) capable of examing the packets of data.
btw of course all routers are powered by software held in its firmware, usually written about some lightweight core such as linux (routers can & do 'crash' )
Imho your average home user with an 'always on' connection wants both a router & some software firewall (other than winows own ! which only does 'ins' )
-
September 7th, 2005, 06:35 PM
#8
Registered User
I've been using ZoneAlarm 2005 Security Suite and have been quite happy. Its not perfect (disabling individual ports is not as easy or convenient as I would like) but I recently read a stellar review of the version 6 from PC Magazine, and they have added some very enticing features.
Similar Threads
-
By TechZ in forum Other Software Applications
Replies: 8
Last Post: September 3rd, 2005, 11:45 AM
-
By MorseLady in forum Hot Hot Deals
Replies: 8
Last Post: March 25th, 2005, 10:39 AM
-
By ringo2143z in forum Windows XP
Replies: 25
Last Post: November 2nd, 2004, 01:28 AM
-
By TangleWeb in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 3
Last Post: November 25th, 2002, 05:56 PM
-
By phoneblock in forum Windows XP
Replies: 1
Last Post: October 15th, 2002, 11:05 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks