To register for an Internet.com membership to receive newsletters and white papers, use the Register button ABOVE.
To participate in the message forums BELOW, click here

WinDrivers Computer Tech Support Forums  

Go Back   WinDrivers Computer Tech Support Forums > For Techs Only > Spyware & Antivirus - Security

Spyware & Antivirus - Security Discuss all system security, spyware, adware and malware issues here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old January 4th, 2001, 03:50 PM   #1
underfunded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Salem NH, USA
Posts: 272
Post NAV Corporate Edition

Has anybody used the corporate/server edition of Norton AntiVirus. I need something that will allow me to monitor virus scans across my network and also make sure that definitions are upto date. Also I want it to notify my if there is a virus found somewhere. I have looked around and NAV Corporate seems my best bet. What do you think? THanks, Ian.
__________________
Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day. Fritter and waste the hours in an off hand way. ---Pink Floyd
underfunded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2001, 11:49 PM   #2
Eagle PC Diagnostech
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 1,109
Post

It does everything your asking for
It's expensive, but so is your data.
I would defineatly recommend it.

------------------
An obstacle is something you see when you take your eyes off your goal.
__________________
An obstacle is something you see when you take your eyes off your goal.
Eagle PC Diagnostech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2001, 08:43 AM   #3
iamtheman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

NAV Corporate Edition will do what you are looking for. Only had one bad experience with it.....I had a client running it on Windows95 machines with the Lotus Notes Client, big mistake. The Notes client and symantec have some kind of weird problem with eating all the resources. I worked with Symantec support for some time and could only slightly alleviate the problem.

------------------
Born to Network
  Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2001, 01:01 PM   #4
Yanish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Yes the cooperate edition is very good for networks.
Can update all comps on a weekly basis...
Definatly well worth it.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2001, 01:10 PM   #5
captpackrat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Too Expensive.

I recently upgraded from 2000 Pro to 2000 Server, and discovered Norton Anti-Virus 2001 wouldn't work on it. So I checked to see how much the Server version was. I was quoted $500! What?! I then checked with Panda, and their server version was $300. Ick. Still too much!

Finally I found Network Associates NetShield. A single license (which was all I needed) cost me a mere $35. Huh? Why is everyone else so much more expensive?




------------------
Captain Troy D. Pack Rat
`akbar Press

If you're furry and you know it, hug the mouse!
  Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2001, 11:33 PM   #6
Grider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Auburn,AL USA
Posts: 81
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Geneva, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by captpackrat:
Too Expensive.

I recently upgraded from 2000 Pro to 2000 Server, and discovered Norton Anti-Virus 2001 wouldn't work on it. So I checked to see how much the Server version was. I was quoted $500! What?! I then checked with Panda, and their server version was $300. Ick. Still too much!

Finally I found Network Associates NetShield. A single license (which was all I needed) cost me a mere $35. Huh? Why is everyone else so much more expensive?


</font>
My corpedition Norton server license was 150 bucks, the software was 17 and the seat license were 50 a pop. The pricing structure on enterprise grade and server anti-virus software is based on how many seats you are buying. When getting quotes for av stuff always remember, ITS YOUR DATA, Do you have the time to rebuild it from scrach if you get something nasty? Consider good av software as an insureance policy.

Grider

[This message has been edited by Grider (edited January 15, 2001).]
Grider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2001, 11:42 PM   #7
Grider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Auburn,AL USA
Posts: 81
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Verdana, Geneva, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Yanish:
Yes the cooperate edition is very good for networks.
Can update all comps on a weekly basis...
Definatly well worth it.
</font>
Actually you can have it try and update every minute if you want :-) Its a memory killer for the server though. My server updates at 10:30p every night and the clients are set to check the server every two hours I beleive. ( I sometimes kick a update in the middle of the day if I notice a new version of the defs out)

Norton is very good, Panda is very good, and I like Innoculan by CA as well. I run Norton at my office and a few others that I consult at.

Grider

Grider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2001, 08:44 PM   #8
houseisland
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,351
Post

We have it at work, and I have set it up on a small test network as a pilot experiment. It is fairly easy to set up, and it seems to work well.

However, I have never been allowed to try a real life deployment of it.

We have no central control of virus updates, and I often visit workstations which have their virus defs almost a year out of date, sometimes more.

I do not understand. I do not understand!

However, mine is not to reason why.

Take the paycheck. Go home.
houseisland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2001, 09:26 AM   #9
ibennetch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by houseisland:
We have no central control of virus updates, and I often visit workstations which have their virus defs almost a year out of date, sometimes more.
</font>
I have never used it but I've seen it installed at my school. Not that it did them any good (the labs are rumored to have more viruses than some of the girls here), because the defs are *so* out of date. I don't know why - perhaps it was set up wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2001, 03:03 PM   #10
jbar1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Isleton, Calif, USA
Posts: 463
Talking

We use NAV corp on our Satellite Network and it has performed just great. Very pricey. I don't have much faith in anything Norton but this is an exception.

------------------
If life is a bitch then what is death? I believe I will take the bitch!
__________________
If life is a bitch, then what is death? I believe that I will take the bitch...
jbar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2001, 10:37 PM   #11
wbatten
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: vancouver, wa, usa
Posts: 233
Post

NetShield has caused me problems! I went back to NAV-CE. I never have had any problems with NAV-CE

NetShield caused slow downs in the network, expecially when the file server is getting heavy usage, compared to NAV-CE plus I was getting false reporting.

-wayne


------------------
I use The best program that cures Windows problems, Far more reliable than Norton Utilities, It's called FORMAT C:............Techno®
__________________
I use The best program that cures Windows problems, Far more reliable than Norton Utilities, It's called FORMAT C:...® [I hate AT&T@home cable service]
wbatten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2001, 03:25 PM   #12
jfesler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I use Norton Enterprise at several locations, it has always worked very well. Very easy to maintain!
Great utility to distribute the program to each workstation.

Have seen a problem with Windows 95 machines not shutting down, after norton is installed.

------------------
Everywhere you go, there you are...
  Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2001, 04:03 PM   #13
Manicheya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Although a little tougher to setup, I would recommend F-Secure Antivirus for your network.

The main reason I like F-Secure is the lower overhead on workstations. F-Secure is also centrally managed and policy-based.

Check it out at www.f-secure.com.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2001, 07:46 PM   #14
Budster64
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

yea it's expensive...but it works.
nuff said
  Reply With Quote
Old February 19th, 2001, 03:07 PM   #15
pcshark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pitman, NJ USA
Posts: 568
Post

We use it in-house, and it's all we sell to our clients. We have also written some docs for installation and also docs we leave with the onsite admins when we do installs, that outline how to use and monitor NAV CE. Let me know if you want any of these (they're not confidential, and since I'm the one who wrote them, the company doesn't complain!)

------------------
R. Bret Walker, CNE
(I'm not a Master Tech, but I play one on TV)

Wondering what videos to rent this weekend? Check out The People's Reviews, movie reviews written for the people and by the people.
__________________
R. Bret Walker, CNE
(I'm not a Master Tech, but I play one on TV)

Wondering what videos to rent this weekend? Check out The People's Reviews, movie reviews written for the people and by the people.
pcshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.



Acceptable Use Policy

internet.comMediabistrojusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info


Advertise | Newsletters | Feedback | Submit News

Legal Notices | Licensing | Permissions | Privacy Policy

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.