Acer(BENQ),Aopen and Lite On
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Acer(BENQ),Aopen and Lite On

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Springfield
    Posts
    44

    Post Acer(BENQ),Aopen and Lite On

    I want to buy CD burner and I am interested in buying either Acer, Aopen or Lite On brand. Can anyone tell me which one is good. Also is there any real different in speed on 24/10/40x and 32/10/40x. Please I need your help before I get one.

  2. #2
    Registered User Budd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    i'm not telling
    Posts
    1,542

    Post

    i can't comment on the Acer or the Lite Ons, but i have used alot of Aopens and they seem to be really good drives. i haven't had a problem yet.

    off the topic, but i've heard that AOpen is a division of Acer, anyone know anything about this?

  3. #3
    Registered User MacGyver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    4,232

    Post

    Choosing between 24X and 32X ? Think about this, you might find it difficult to find 32X certified blank CD's. I have a hard enough time finding 24X. Plus when you do find them, you may pay a lot more. Then again, a 32X isn't much more and you can always drop down the write speed.

  4. #4
    Registered User swamprat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    LaBelle, Florida USA
    Posts
    314

    Post

    I've used both lite-ons and acers. Just got a 24X Lite-on a couple of weeks ago, and have not had any problems making cd's using Nero.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    2

    Post

    I just bought a Lite-ON 32x/12x/40x CD-RW drive to replace my Sony Expressa 8x/4x/32 CD-RW drive. I bought 32x CD-R certified media and I still burn CDs at the same speed of 7 minutes (for a 700MB CD-R) like my older Sony CD-RW drive. I run the Lite-ON CD-RW drive on a PIII 750MHz/Ultra 66 ATA/256MB PC100 SDRAM/WIN2000Pro/Nero (that came bundled with the drive). I am upset at the performance but really haven't tried to investigate what the cause may be for the slowness. I'd go with the 24x unless the 32x is only $10 more.

  6. #6
    Registered User BC GREEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    DENISON,TX
    Posts
    351

    Post

    i`ve had my lite on (12-10-32)for about a year now.no problems yet!

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Bentleyville, Pa
    Posts
    462

    Post

    I have an acer 20X and though it isn't truly a 20X,(it's a 20X MAX it only hits 20X write speeds for a brief part of writing) It does well enough for me. I haven't had any trouble with it. It runs NERO great and clone cd makes impeccable backups with it.

  8. #8
    Registered User Darren Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    859

    Post

    Every Lite-On CDRW that I have seen has become faulty within 4 weeks of usage. Most are DOA straight out of the box.

    IMO it is worth spending the little bit extra and buying a Plextor. Warranties are first class (I removed the bezel on my 24x10x40 and the paint I used actually melted it. A quick email to Plextor, and even though it wasn't a warranty claim, they sent me a new bezel free of charge NEXT DAY DELIVARY from Belgium). The Plextor 40x CDRW is now so cheap that others simply aren't worth looking at IMO.
    Darren Wilson is the ....... MONKEY HUNTER..... Coming to a big screen near you soon!!!

  9. #9
    Driver Terrier NooNoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    31,824

    Post

    Darren, I am sorry you have had problems with the Lite-Ons.. I have fitted 5 so far this year and they are still running very well. Sounds like you got all the bad ones in one order!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •