A Few Questions About RAID (No, Not the Bug Spray)

Paco L 250 · May 13th, 2001, 06:14 PM

RAID!? *We fall over, dead.*

Anyway, I just want to know, what is it? I've heard things like Mode 0, 1, etc. How does an EIDE drive plug into a RAID Mobo? For example, I have an IBM 60 GB HDD that I want to work with the ABit KT7A-RAID Mobo.

You can see my confusion.

Thanks!

May 13th, 2001, 06:38 PM

Via a standard ATA100 cable like it does to a normal IDE socket. You need at least 2 identical drives to make a RAID configuration.

Antimatter · May 14th, 2001, 12:16 AM

RAID 0: Striping. Turns two drives into one doubling the capacity. Can double the data rate for large files if they're physically stored on different drives.
RAID 1: Mirroring: Looks like one drive to the user(only using half the available capacity). Automatically backs up data from one drive to the other. V. Good for businesses.

May 15th, 2001, 02:52 PM

um... they kinda have it right. RAID is a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. There are hardware and software solutions. You do NOT need identical hard drives to set up a raid array... just identical partitions (If you set up to different sized drives... your array will be limited by the smaller drive.)

Raid is good for fault tolerance and for speed increase or both depending on what you set up. Raid 0, Raid 1, Raid 0+1 and Raid 5 are the configurations mostly in use today.

Raid 0 - (2 drives) disk striping... data written to the drives is wriiten on alternating clusters so the load is spread evenly. This gives you an array roughly DOUBLE the size of your to drives (10+10=20)

Raid 1 - (2 drives) Disk Mirroring. All data written is written to 2 drives at same time. Because it uses 2 drives your storage space is halved (10)+(10)=10

Raid 0+1 (4 drives) Disk Striping +Mirroring.
In this setup you have 2 Striped arrays mirroring each other. Provides some degree of redundancy but is VERY expensive... 4 hard drives?? ((10+10)+(10+10)) = 20

Raid 5 (3 drives) This usually takes a SCSI solution or Software Raid (Linux, Win2k server) You get increased capacity, redundancy, and performance this way. This gives you the effective capacity of 2 of the drives and one drives does hashing. With raid 5 if ANY of the drives crashes... your array stays up and if you have Hot Swappable bays installed and a controller that handles it.. you can replace a drive on the fly. The best performance and most economical setup. (10+10+10)=20

The best detailed explanation i have run across is at RedHat's site: http://www.redhat.com/support/manual...e/ch-raid.html

For a home system I would stay away from raid 0 (no backup if one fails) and consider RAID1 if you want basic redundancy. If you are considering RAID 0+1 that may be an option... as going the preferred routes takes a $400+ SCSI Raid5 controller and 3 SCSI Drives. Good Luck.

May 13th, 2001, 06:14 PM	#1
Paco L 250 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Accountz Reeceevable Posts: 129	A Few Questions About RAID (No, Not the Bug Spray) RAID!? We fall over, dead. Anyway, I just want to know, what is it? I've heard things like Mode 0, 1, etc. How does an EIDE drive plug into a RAID Mobo? For example, I have an IBM 60 GB HDD that I want to work with the ABit KT7A-RAID Mobo. You can see my confusion. Thanks! __________________ PACO L 250 "I am an expert of electricity. My father occupied the chair of applied electricity at the state prison." - WC Fields Games I'm Currently Playing: Homeworld 2 (PC), StarWars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords (XBOX), and Xenogears (PSOne) Games I Want/Need: StarCraft: Ghost (XBOX), StarFox Armada (GC), and Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines (PC)

May 14th, 2001, 12:16 AM	#3
Antimatter Registered User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Aotearoa Posts: 502	RAID 0: Striping. Turns two drives into one doubling the capacity. Can double the data rate for large files if they're physically stored on different drives. RAID 1: Mirroring: Looks like one drive to the user(only using half the available capacity). Automatically backs up data from one drive to the other. V. Good for businesses. __________________ To prove something, one must first try to disprove it.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

May 13th, 2001, 06:38 PM	#2
Darren Wilson Guest Posts: n/a	Via a standard ATA100 cable like it does to a normal IDE socket. You need at least 2 identical drives to make a RAID configuration.

May 15th, 2001, 02:52 PM	#4
thecoolbean Guest Posts: n/a	um... they kinda have it right. RAID is a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. There are hardware and software solutions. You do NOT need identical hard drives to set up a raid array... just identical partitions (If you set up to different sized drives... your array will be limited by the smaller drive.) Raid is good for fault tolerance and for speed increase or both depending on what you set up. Raid 0, Raid 1, Raid 0+1 and Raid 5 are the configurations mostly in use today. Raid 0 - (2 drives) disk striping... data written to the drives is wriiten on alternating clusters so the load is spread evenly. This gives you an array roughly DOUBLE the size of your to drives (10+10=20) Raid 1 - (2 drives) Disk Mirroring. All data written is written to 2 drives at same time. Because it uses 2 drives your storage space is halved (10)+(10)=10 Raid 0+1 (4 drives) Disk Striping +Mirroring. In this setup you have 2 Striped arrays mirroring each other. Provides some degree of redundancy but is VERY expensive... 4 hard drives?? ((10+10)+(10+10)) = 20 Raid 5 (3 drives) This usually takes a SCSI solution or Software Raid (Linux, Win2k server) You get increased capacity, redundancy, and performance this way. This gives you the effective capacity of 2 of the drives and one drives does hashing. With raid 5 if ANY of the drives crashes... your array stays up and if you have Hot Swappable bays installed and a controller that handles it.. you can replace a drive on the fly. The best performance and most economical setup. (10+10+10)=20 The best detailed explanation i have run across is at RedHat's site: http://www.redhat.com/support/manual...e/ch-raid.html For a home system I would stay away from raid 0 (no backup if one fails) and consider RAID1 if you want basic redundancy. If you are considering RAID 0+1 that may be an option... as going the preferred routes takes a $400+ SCSI Raid5 controller and 3 SCSI Drives. Good Luck.