|
-
December 29th, 2002, 10:12 PM
#1
Making Star Trek Elite Force preform better
Alright, Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force is a bit slow and jumpy on my system. I heard their are ways to make it work faster which are "undocumented" (atleast that's what Activision told me).
What are the ways to make it work better (other than upgrading my computer)?
-
December 30th, 2002, 07:15 AM
#2
Driver Terrier
-
December 30th, 2002, 04:44 PM
#3
Compaq Presario 2286
Cryix MII 333 MHz Processor
3D Blaster Savage4 32 Megs Bios version 1.04 B
160 megs of Ram
4 Gig hard drive
32x CD-ROM
DirectX Version 9.0
Windows 2000 Professional
-
December 30th, 2002, 04:48 PM
#4
Re: Making Star Trek Elite Force preform better
Originally posted by thomasca
Alright, Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force is a bit slow and jumpy on my system. I heard their are ways to make it work faster which are "undocumented" (atleast that's what Activision told me).
What are the ways to make it work better (other than upgrading my computer)?
Just as a comparison to your system, I was running this on a
P3-1ghz, 128Ram, 40 Gig HD.
And it was real jumpy for me. So You only having the CyrixII 333mhz with the same problem, atleast you know it's not your processor alone.
-
December 30th, 2002, 05:01 PM
#5
Yes, I know it's not my system, since StarFleet Command II runs real smooth on my system, and it needs more processor than Elite Force, and it has the same 3D requirements. And I know it's not space, since my computer almost never touches the hard drive while playing the game.
I have it set all the textures so it goes the fastest, but it acts the same as on normal.
-
December 30th, 2002, 11:11 PM
#6
Registered User
Dude, pop for a GeForce 3 Ti 500. They are down to under $100 and with the GeForce FX (*drooool*) I bet the price would drop even more.
Savage4 is one of those chips that didnt catch on. Get a GeForce 3.... strong video drivers man. You could even pop for a GeForce 4 Ti whatever after the GeForce FX comes out.
-
December 30th, 2002, 11:59 PM
#7
But is there anything I can do with software. I'm not really full of cash right now...
-
December 31st, 2002, 07:47 AM
#8
Driver Terrier
If this game allows configuration of video, I suggest you turn down all the extras... it will be a trade off, less jumpiness means less detail.
-
January 12th, 2003, 07:58 PM
#9
Dude, pop for a GeForce 3 Ti 500. They are down to under $100 and with the GeForce FX (*drooool*) I bet the price would drop even more.
Alright, I'm thinking of going for the card. But would it really boost performance on the kind of machine I have?
-
January 14th, 2003, 04:46 PM
#10
The main problem you are facing is how slow that CPU is. 333 Mhz doesn't seem bad at first, but Cyrix chips never have been gaming chips. Its performance would be less than the clock would lead you to beleive. Basically what I'm saying is that you don't have enough CPU to benefit from anything over a GeForce 1 DDR. Really with those specs I'd recommend you go the MX 420 or Radeon 8500/9000 route. Much more video card than you can handle for less than $70. If you want further recommendations, just ask. I can dig up a few specifics fairly quick.
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair."
The Hitchikers Guide to the Universe - Mostly Harmless - Douglas Adams
-
January 15th, 2003, 11:17 AM
#11
Registered User
Originally posted by Tazdrummer
the GeForce FX (*drooool*)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks