MFT needs defragging ... !?
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: MFT needs defragging ... !?

  1. #1
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087

    Question MFT needs defragging ... !?

    MFT (Master File Table) seems to have several fragments (35) .... machine is sluggy to start - over a minute & generally iffy running for what it is ..... this particular PC gets stuff put on & off all the time & it has a stunning 100,000 odd files on it (...or it did ) !!!.... soooo I've decided that's the problem ... but how do I do it !?!?!

    Defrag leaves it alone, I take it I need something like Diskeeper .... can anyone point me to a free tool that does it ?

    I've search-ed MS KB but all I found was this really useful statement .... Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 303079

    Currently, only third-party defrag utilities consolidate unused MFT FRS records and reclaim unused MFT allocated space




    Uncle bill strikes again....

  2. #2
    Chat Operator Matridom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,778
    windows defragmenter is created by executive software (Creators of diskeeper)

    Diskeeper is far better and worth the money.

    However, they DO have a free 30 day trial download that you could use. For something like this, i would trust no other program.

  3. #3
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087
    Okay so I went & got the trial of diskeeper ... ran it ... several 'ages' later I get it finnished ... still 4 MFT fragments ... ran again ... several more 'ages' .... still 4 mft fragments .... but its only 57% full ?

    WTF? This seems 'most bogus' !!

    Lets see, first NTFS munches 1/8 of my disk for the flipping MFT (oh yeah that's not much overhead for a file system is it!?) & then it refuses to even get it all in one file even when I go get another utility to sort it out....

    So being 'mad' at it, I backed up the whole volume onto a.n.other machine, ghosted on a new setup (with only one MFT file !!!) .... restored all the files from my backup and then looked at the MFT .... Ta-Da !!! only one MFT fragment.... & a vast improvement (even over the halfway point with 4 fragments)....

    Strikes me this is absolute pants ! So I went hunting around the building looking at all the machines here, variously there are between 0-35 fragments (I had found the 'worst') but it looks like I have a new job ... running endless backups/restores to get rid of this .... Arrrrrgh! this was one of the justifications for 'upgrading' to xp/2000 .... wipes egg from face & goes off to sulk !

  4. #4
    Geezer confus-ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    In front of my PC....
    Posts
    13,087

    Arrow

    Mmmmm .... still not happy with this .... having done the backup/restore trick a couple of times I was using a lot of time up... but I was getting happy users - so I persisted ... I found another utility by Raxco - PerfectDisk 2000 which defragged the MFT straight away - not as good as Diskeeper at actually defragging the rest of the file system, but it did its stuff with MFT fragments....

    But the hard way (backup/restore) still seemed to produce substantially 'faster' machines !!?? So as ever I was confus-ed .... until I discovered that the MFT never ever shrinks - WTF? Top design feature I thinkee NOT !

    So when you are setting up a machine for the first time and adding all those applications that create tens of thousands of temp files this makes the MFT grow & grow, it doesn't matter that you then delete those files, a new MFT entry has been created, ok it can get used again later but what if I don't want or need to use it later ?? Every time I want to access a file the machine reads the MFT & then spends ages skipping all those 'old' entries until it finds a valid entry ... if this was a database every administrator would be laughing at me telling me to just re-create the table .. which is what I guess I am doing with the backup/restore trick ... no doubt there's a valid reason why windoze is designed this way, but it strikes me as pants!

    So anyways I now have a host of machines with only one MFT fragment (well there'll be two - 'cos there are two copies) and none of them appear so full, before they averaged 50-80% full, now they average 25-40% full...

    So yet another reason if you are a home user & don't need the security aspects of NTFS to stick with FAT....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •