|
-
July 1st, 2003, 04:28 AM
#1
Geezer
-
July 1st, 2003, 07:33 AM
#2
Registered User
RedHat and Mandrake seem to be the two big dogs and have been around for a few years.
I think the support and documentation is out there for both which is my deciding factor, because with Linux it's all about reading up on how to do it.
As far as hardware requirements I would steer clear of trying to get it on a P1 system and go with the recommendations of the package you choose if not double them. 
As far as software to put on it goes what do you wanna do?
-
July 1st, 2003, 09:41 AM
#3
Registered User
yes to start out use mandrake or redhat... hehe when i first started with unix I ran netbsd when i was in 9th grade, back in 1994 (a wee lad) it was kinda ahrd at first, then i went to linux which was 100000 tiems eaiser 
any who, if you want a distro that you dont have to install I suggust http://www.knoppix.org/
you can run linux off a cdrom 
when you get better at linux you might want to take on the challenge of Genttoo and Slackware..Slackware is myt fav. Distro
hope this helps
-
July 1st, 2003, 08:54 PM
#4
Geezer
-
July 1st, 2003, 11:38 PM
#5
Registered User
Truthfully, a friend bought the Red Hat 8.0 Bible, and tried out Red Hat 8.0
His skills have now surpassed my own by far with Linux.... Though I still make his brain churn on Unix.
Moral of story: Definetly a good purchase.
-
July 2nd, 2003, 09:32 AM
#6
Registered User
Yeah it's a good buy. However red hat is very limited 'out of the box' compared to windows. What I mean is, you're gonna have to search the web to be able to hack it enough to get stuff like mp3's or NTFS compatibility. Mandrake 9.1 however is VERY similar to redhat and has all those functions built in. I remember spending a whole weekend trying to get my DVD and mp3's to work and trying to access my ntfs partition on redhat and then wiping everything and installing mandrake 9.1 and having all that functionality as soon as it was installed. PlusI find it looks better than RH.
Today, a haiku:
Google, you f**ktard
my fingers are so weary
of repeating crap
-
July 2nd, 2003, 09:42 AM
#7
Geezer
NTFS ?
Can any 'flavour' of unix correctly accesss NTFS ?? ... All the unix guys I know ... say no way Hosé ... there are some utils for early ntfs but not apparently NTFS 5 like w2k / xp use ... or so I'm told (permissions issues) ... if you want to share files use fat32 which linux 'understands' ....
(But I'm recommending the book (bible) ... not the 'flavour' )
-
July 2nd, 2003, 09:44 AM
#8
Registered User
Originally posted by gtiseb
Yeah it's a good buy. However red hat is very limited 'out of the box' compared to windows. What I mean is, you're gonna have to search the web to be able to hack it enough to get stuff like mp3's or NTFS compatibility. Mandrake 9.1 however is VERY similar to redhat and has all those functions built in. I remember spending a whole weekend trying to get my DVD and mp3's to work and trying to access my ntfs partition on redhat and then wiping everything and installing mandrake 9.1 and having all that functionality as soon as it was installed. PlusI find it looks better than RH.
true this si one reason why most people goto linux, one its not windows, it doesnt function like it, which I like, another, is you can do so much it makes you think ehhe...damn point n click environment...doh
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks