|
-
September 12th, 2003, 10:54 PM
#1
Driver Terrier
If you had to dual boot two flavours of linux
If you had to dual boot two flavours of linux, what would they be? How would you do it? Which order would you install them in and why did you make those choices?
-
September 13th, 2003, 10:36 AM
#2
Registered User
Hmmmm
Mint Chocolate Chip and Coffee would be my two choices for a minty wake you up sorta flavor.
Oh wait Linux! OK I got ya. I was distracted by flavors there for a second. 
I have been liking the heck out of Mandrake 9.1 lately due to it's control center where you can actually do stuff, which is a novel concept apparently. I changed over from Redhat 7.2 which worked well enough.
Second choice would be a Knoppix distrobution such as Knoppix STD for the security tools built in which are helpfull for a network tech/admin.
not technically a dualboot, but those are my two areas of need for Linux. Mandrake for home and play and Knoppix STD for work.
"And just when I thought today couldn't get anymore poo-like." -Outcoded
-
September 13th, 2003, 12:52 PM
#3
Registered User
Well I would boot Slackware Linux cause its my favorite Distro and humm maybe Redhat
Id install slackware first with the following (120GB HDD)
Swap - partition 1 800 mb
/boot - 200MB
/ - 59 GB
install slackware setup lilo then Id go ahead and install redhat linux
(you could reuse the same swap as slackware but there maybe some problems)
so Id do the same configureation with Redhat
Swap - partition 1 800 mb
/boot - 200MB
/ - 59 GB
and redhat should auto detect slackware and put it in the lilo conf if not then after install boot into redhat and edit the lilo.conf file and put in the slackware partiton to boot from
-
September 19th, 2003, 04:45 PM
#4
Registered User
I've had alot of trouble with the new Linux Distros.
Try QNX Neutrino http://www.qnx.com/eval/ it is very good and runs most Linux apps with a recompile as well.
I think my favorite Linux is Mandrake.
-
October 3rd, 2003, 01:48 PM
#5
Registered User
Mandrake 9.1 and Redhat 8.0
I like those two. They make me happie. Very happie. Mandrake first of course because it makes me a lot happier. Mostly because it opens RPM files without the command line.
-
October 3rd, 2003, 02:18 PM
#6
Registered User
Mandrake: built around the stable Red Hat kernel, but more "userfriendly" IMO.
FreeBSD: to explore all the security options it has.
-
October 3rd, 2003, 02:43 PM
#7
Tech-To-Tech Mod
 Originally Posted by NooNoo
If you had to dual boot two flavours of linux, what would they be?
chocolate chip cookie dough
and
heavenly hash
those are the two flavors of ice cr . . . . . oh wait we're talking bout linux. . . . . never mind
-
October 3rd, 2003, 05:28 PM
#8
Registered User
I would probably run gentoo and RH9, i would be more likely to run gentoo and XP as my home and work computers are set up.
-
October 5th, 2003, 04:58 PM
#9
RH9 and mandrake 9.x...to see what all the fuss is about...not quite sure where i would want each to live though...
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:15 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by NooNoo
If you had to dual boot two flavours of linux, what would they be? How would you do it? Which order would you install them in and why did you make those choices?
Interesting no one said Suse. Why?
-
December 30th, 2004, 05:39 PM
#11
Registered User
 Originally Posted by digi
Interesting no one said Suse. Why?
its a debian based, dont like rpm or debian based distros
-
January 17th, 2005, 11:27 AM
#12
Registered User
Fedora Core (whatever they are at now) just cause it's so freakin' popular. I would install this one first on a 10-20gb partition.
Then I would install Gentoo. Follow the handbood and just create the proper grub entry and your set.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks