Tough choice when you have to stick away from the big franchises (SW, ST, MAtrix, LOTR, etc.)
Printable View
Tough choice when you have to stick away from the big franchises (SW, ST, MAtrix, LOTR, etc.)
Wow what a tuff choice...
after debating for a while i decided on army of darkness, great flick but mallrats was a definate close second. back to the future was great but the sequels were weak...kevin smith rocks but bruce campbell was pure genius in army...thats right i said the words!!
but how could i disregard lines like :
"It's a schooner!" "You dumb ba$tard its a sailboat!"
damn i want to vote again......
I'll nominate Highlander 2 for the WORST sequel. :D
I'll second that!!!Quote:
Originally posted by meatwad
I'll nominate Highlander 2 for the WORST sequel. :D
On that list, Army of Darkness without a doubt. It & Evil Dead 2 both surpassed the original in every way.
I don't see how Mallrats can be considered "sequel" per se...I mean, they both share some characters (Jay & Silent Bob), and make references to certain events - the chick having the embolism in a pool...Randall & Brodie both have/had a cousin Walter who did weird stuff to themselves sexually), but they didn't really continue a main story or anything.
Any kevin smith movie
Quote:
Originally posted by Cobra Tha Funky Homo Sapien
On that list, Army of Darkness without a doubt. It & Evil Dead 2 both surpassed the original in every way.
I don't see how Mallrats can be considered "sequel" per se...I mean, they both share some characters (Jay & Silent Bob), and make references to certain events - the chick having the embolism in a pool...Randall & Brodie both have/had a cousin Walter who did weird stuff to themselves sexually), but they didn't really continue a main story or anything.
Actually they do....somwhat, kevin smiths movies are called the Jersey Trilogy, even though there are 5 of them.
They dont continue a story per se', but they all show events that happen in around a 3 day period in the jersey area, kevin smith himself even calls them sequels from time to time
I can't believe nobody has mentioned Aliens. Admittedly Alien was the better film but Aliens must be the best shoot'm up sci-fi flick ever.
T2 wins hands down.
Don't forget Die Harder and Die Hard with a Vengance. Those were pretty good sequels.
Most movies that have sequels are a rsult of the original being a hit. If the 1st one didnt do squat, they "usually" do not make a 2nd one. You would think they would have learned after Highlander 2 to just plain stop please dear god stop!!
Some movies like the Star Wars trillogy were orignally 1 whole story, but had to be split into 3 movies because of size. Lucas now has enough money he can put out any movie he wants without any worries about a studio backing him up. Not listening to George's plan to produce a movie is like saying you don't want to hear Steven Spielberg's opinion on directing.
Together those 2 equal totally awesome movies.
I have to agree with the T2 crowd, brilliant.
However, the Guy Ritchie movie Snatch is much better than Lock Stock, but can it be called a sequel? I think so, and that for me was the best ever because I have watched it 10+ times and still find new things to laugh out loud at!!
At the other end of the scale it has to be Police Academy. s h i * e!
I think The Goonies should have had a sequel.
it was supposed to
You forgot:
Star Trek - The Movie (with Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelly) Forget TNG- the series just isn't as good.
Godfather - All of them
Superman - All of them
Batman (the first two - the third was the 'nippled' batman and had nothing but explosions and special effects)
and Rocky
Also:
Deep Throat 2 & 3 (much better than the original)
:D
I liked both the Ghostbusters and Back to the Future. They were both great movies, and pretty hilarious. Back to the Future most likely was the best of those choices. I have all 3 movies, but my personal fave is the 2nd one:cool: