Moore and O'Reilly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

Moore's points sucked in that interview! All he came up with was would you send a child to get killed? The U.S. has a volunteer military which means that those who join do so of their own free will and if they later say yeah but I didn't want to go to war I only joined for the GI bill then I say tough @*&! you knew the conditions before you volunteered. The war was to remove someone from power who killed his own people, was trying to help Al-Queda, and was trying to obtain wmd all things that the rest of the world has said is unexceptable under Saddam's leadership. Moore tried to turn it in to a moral issue yet when Bill C. got caught lying his shorts off over sexual infedility it was a personal issue between Bill and Hillary. What a two faced flip flop!

---

No one died because of the blowjob

You are aware O'Reilly has his staff talking to him in his earpiece helping him out? And that O'Reilly is a professional on air person and Moore is a director?
I would have assumed O'Reilly should win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

No one died because of the blowjob

---

His vice president was in charge of transportation safety at the time and was told of the possibility of terrorists doing something similar to 9/11 but the two wankers were to busy with bj's to do anything about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

Moore's points sucked in that interview! All he came up with was would you send a child to get killed? The U.S. has a volunteer military which means that those who join do so of their own free will and if they later say yeah but I didn't want to go to war I only joined for the GI bill then I say tough @*&! you knew the conditions before you volunteered. The war was to remove someone from power who killed his own people, was trying to help Al-Queda, and was trying to obtain wmd all things that the rest of the world has said is unexceptable under Saddam's leadership. Moore tried to turn it in to a moral issue yet when Bill C. got caught lying his shorts off over sexual infedility it was a personal issue between Bill and Hillary. What a two faced flip flop!

---

First, wheither the child volunteered or not, it is still a child.

Second, when you say: "The war was to " you should have said: "The war was supposed to be because of"

Third, lying over assault with a friendly weapon is hardly the same as lying about the reasons to go to war and have people die.

Bush lied, people died.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

No one died because of the blowjob

---

Any man with control of that many nukes I want to be making sure he's getting blown.... ALOT..... I want him to be relaxed

Clinton got a BJ from a cubby intern...

JFK had a set of twins and was nailing Marilyn Monroe...

LOL I miss the old days

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Escape_Driver

Clinton got a BJ from a cubby intern...

JFK had a set of twins and was nailing Marilyn Monroe...

LOL I miss the old days

---

Who says Democrats don't know how to have fun! https://forums.windrivers.com/images.../2005/03/1.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techs

You are aware O'Reilly has his staff talking to him in his earpiece helping him out? And that O'Reilly is a professional on air person and Moore is a director?
I would have assumed O'Reilly should win.

---

But Moore has done these interviews many times, over many of the same topics, he’s always prepared. He is a spin doctor, and ran around the answers left and right, he’s good at placating his aggressor because he’s so used to being the antagonist, but that’s about the extent of it. I do agree with the Major, in that O’Rily didn't deliver any knock out blow...never the less, Moore couldn't come up with a thing. He said he still thinks that Bush is a liar over the WMD’s, yet he's been proven wrong.

And the part about sending someone’s own kid to war…when a child becomes 18 and decides he/she’s a man/woman, and wants to defend this country as a member of the armed services, they cease to be a child. They are also not the responsibility of the parent any longer, the US Government will take the responsibility. If a parent doesn’t want their children to join, they have the opportunity to protest with their kids, but ultimately the decision is not the parents, and remember that it is a voluntary hitch. So just where was Moore trying to take that anyway?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jitBob

First, wheither the child volunteered or not, it is still a child.

Second, when you say: "The war was to " you should have said: "The war was supposed to be because of"

Third, lying over assault with a friendly weapon is hardly the same as lying about the reasons to go to war and have people die.

Bush lied, people died.

---

18 you become adult right? If not then when do you become old enough to make descions on your own? 20? 30? or maybe when they see things your way eh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

18 you become adult right? If not then when do you become old enough to make descions on your own? 20? 30? or maybe when they see things your way eh?

---

At 18 you are numericly an adult. How many are actually capable of making life and death decisions?

Could you easily make the decision to send very young people into harms way. Wouldn't you have some worry/doubt/regret about doing it? Especially if the reason wasn't cut and dried, black and white, beyond the shadow of a doubt, could you?

Then why aren't 18 year olds then responsible enough to drink or rent cars?

So are you saying once your child is 18 you are no longer going to have any protective feelings or care about them in harms way?

If I had seen the video of Sadam's military killy 3106 people and shoving their bodies into a whole in the ground and dumping chemicals over the bodies to make the decompose faster and mask the smell then hell yeah I could. Is it ok for him to kill over 3100 people? Or perhaps it only matters when they kick your door down and drag you into the street rape and kill your family in front of you then kill you? I assert that at this point its to late to do something about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

So are you saying once your child is 18 you are no longer going to have any protective feelings or care about them in harms way?

---

I would always care but if they join the military of their own free will I also would support their descion and respect them for doing whats right.

And not mind them dieing in a preemptive war that was sold to us on false reasoning?