Poll. Did Bush Mislead us about the Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Cause we want the drugs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TripleRLtd

WTF????https://forums.windrivers.com/images.../2005/02/1.gif Get freaking real man!! So many of us are sooo sick of ALL this bull****e!!

---

I for one am not sick of it. So don't speak for me... :thumbs: It keeps the site alive if you ask me!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ilovetheusers

How does a trillion $$$ in drug traffic (I made that # up) occur in the most advanced nation in the world?

---

Oh yeah, and we never showed "proof" to the UN on exactly where the drugs were being made, sent in a force as big as we did for Iraq then somehow lose track of all of them. I mean really, if we are attacking them to get rid of WMD's, cause we are afraid they would use them, wouldn't we be keeping better track of them to help our forces as they attack, in case they are used? Which once again, was the reason for disarming in the first place?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

Oh yeah, and we never showed "proof" to the UN on exactly where the drugs were being made, sent in a force as big as we did for Iraq then somehow lose track of all of them. I mean really, if we are attacking them to get rid of WMD's, cause we are afraid they would use them, wouldn't we be keeping better track of them to help our forces as they attack, in case they are used? Which once again, was the reason for disarming in the first place?

---

Rumsfeld said "We know exactly where they are"

I for one could care less about the wmd it boils down to some evil putz was killing people and threatening the rest of the worlds freedoms. Is it right for someone to just kill whomever they want and lead through terror I for one say hell no! Kill em all and let God sort em out!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

I for one could care less about the wmd it boils down to some evil putz was killing people and threatening the rest of the worlds freedoms. Is it right for someone to just kill whomever they want and lead through terror I for one say hell no! Kill em all and let God sort em out!

---

So was there a problem with Clinton lieing about the blowjob?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

So was there a problem with Clinton lieing about the blowjob?

---

Not only I do I think he was a liar I feel that instead of getting a hummer he should have tried to do something about letting Sadam carry on with his terror and brutality of his people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

I for one could care less about the wmd it boils down to some evil putz was killing people and threatening the rest of the worlds freedoms. Is it right for someone to just kill whomever they want and lead through terror I for one say hell no! Kill em all and let God sort em out!

---

By that reasoning we should be invading N. Korea, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, etc?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

Not only I do I think he was a liar I feel that instead of getting a hummer he should have tried to do something about letting Sadam carry on with his terror and brutality of his people.

---

Bush Sr didn't do that either, so is he to blame as well?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

I for one could care less about the wmd it boils down to some evil putz was killing people and threatening the rest of the worlds freedoms. Is it right for someone to just kill whomever they want and lead through terror I for one say hell no! Kill em all and let God sort em out!

---

I was quaking in terror with worry that the evil dictator of a country of sand was going to come over here and defeat our armed services, deprive me of my freedom and get all the white women. Get real.

Saddam was an evil man who is getting what he deserves, but being lied to about the reason we had to go in there is an awful bitter pill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

Not only I do I think he was a liar I feel that instead of getting a hummer he should have tried to do something about letting Sadam carry on with his terror and brutality of his people.

---

Like the Cleet one says, Bush the first is really to blame. President Clinton continued his (Bush's) policy of containment. We had a large coalition of troops there that could have finished the job in 1991, instead we stopped. Does that make George Sr weak?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunob

I for one could care less about the wmd it boils down to some evil putz was killing people and threatening the rest of the worlds freedoms. Is it right for someone to just kill whomever they want and lead through terror I for one say hell no! Kill em all and let God sort em out!

---

Is it right for us to follow a leader that is a terror to the mid-east ? How many innocent people do you think our bombs have killed ? Kill em all and let God sort them out ? Really ? This is what the "Good" people do ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jitBob

Like the Cleet one says, Bush the first is really to blame. President Clinton continued his (Bush's) policy of containment. We had a large coalition of troops there that could have finished the job in 1991, instead we stopped. Does that make George Sr weak?

---

Are you high? Clinton launched a few missles that did nothing. The first war with Bush Sr. was to free a country which we did.

So Saddam was a nice guy with no WMD's when Bush pushed him out and didn't go bad until Clinton was in office?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jitBob

I was quaking in terror with worry that the evil dictator of a country of sand was going to come over here and defeat our armed services, deprive me of my freedom and get all the white women. Get real.

---

Whats to stop him from training a handful of terrorists to hijack a few planes and fly them into a building and kill people. Or maybe the jackass would think to make ricin or a nuke and carry it onto the plane and then fly it into a building. I would rather take the fight to them than try and stop them from killing people.