..and what's another hour or two..? you could test this if you like !
This is what you get for using images :p instead of formatting 'properly' & doing it the hard way, so I spit yet more on Hpoohey :D
I keep finding myself saying that imaging tools are not always the tool for the job & I think this is a classic example of how someone else not understanding can cause 'unforseen' troubles .. so a techo wotpp :D
Get a run of say 60gb disks & format them & watch what happens, if you've got a decent span of disks (so not all from the same production run) then you'll find when formatted they all come out slightly different in capacity terms - overlay that with a standard image (complete of course with its own MFT & bootsector based on the images size & NOT the disks real size) & hey presto you are as dumb as the bloke at hp ;)
Its all to do with calculating physical cyclinder boundaries for the logical offsets to work, one must start the disk & one must fall at the end of the disk (& then work out the others in between) - put an image on it & you transfer the mft & MBR from the image to the disk - errr wrong ! you don't want that at all, unless you fix it first, some stuff can do this right & some stuff can't & some can do it right for some file systems & some can't (they all got better btw - they are on to this but not perfect yet & older copies are worse for this).
This about logical vs physical disk geography refers
Quote:
So it appears they are doing something to the formatting
IMO all that lot above answers what they are doing wrong, using crap imaging tools :D & effectively not getting the formatting right at all :thumbs: