Ok,.. that's a reasonable answer. And what made him decide to write the book? Obviously he wants to make money,.. but why a book about this exact topic?Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovetheusers
Printable View
Ok,.. that's a reasonable answer. And what made him decide to write the book? Obviously he wants to make money,.. but why a book about this exact topic?Quote:
Originally Posted by ilovetheusers
Cause he knows that pinhead liberals like yourself will probably buy the book, even after the election...it's a money making scheme... :thumbs:Quote:
Originally Posted by WebHead
Wow,... that was an intelligent remark. Thanks for the kind words. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ya_know
[Predator whisper and echo]Anytime…time…ime…me[/Predator whisper and echo]Quote:
Originally Posted by WebHead
"Uhh -- Gosh, I -- don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those, uhh, exaggerations."Quote:
Originally Posted by Ya_know
-- To quote Dubya (3/13/2002): "I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him." Third Presidential Debate, Tempe, Arizona, Oct. 13, 2004
Audio
Counterpoint time!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...2869_1,00.html
"I'm a Democrat for Bush
Sarah Baxter is a life-long Labour voter in Britain and a registered Democrat in the United States. So how come she wants George W Bush to remain president?"
"...I confess I am irked by the Massachusetts senator’s personality. With his patrician ancestry, going back to the Puritans on his mother’s side, he acts as though he is born to rule. School friends recall his insufferable vanity about sharing the same initials as John F Kennedy.
With limited means of his own, he has a fondness for heiresses that Jane Austen would have recognised. His first wife was from a family worth $300m. When they separated, Kerry was forced to live on his own relatively meagre salary. Thus began his years as “Cash and Kerry”: he has the distinction of having taken more money from lobbyists in Washington than any other senator, Democrat or Republican.
Only when he wooed and won the hand of Teresa Heinz, the billionaire baked beans widow, was Kerry again able to indulge in the agreeable elite life to which he feels entitled.
I could perhaps overlook that, given that Bush is also from a privileged family, but I cannot forgive Kerry’s complacency on foreign policy.
In a magazine interview last week Kerry recalled his reaction to the September 11 attacks. “You know, my instinct was, where’s my gun?” His all-too-characteristic pander to the gun lobby — he is always going on about shooting small, defenceless creatures — did not impress me when he went on to say: “I mean it didn’t change me at all. It just sort of accelerated, confirmed in me, the urgency of doing the things I thought we needed to be doing.” "
....And another one
http://www.hacer.org/current/US128.php
"Campaign 2004: High Stakes
Quite simply, Kerry must be stopped; and Bush must win
By Paul Johnson
The great issue in the 2004 election—it seems to me as an Englishman—is, How seriously does the United States take its role as a world leader, and how far will it make sacrifices, and risk unpopularity, to discharge this duty with success and honor? In short, this is an election of the greatest significance, for Americans and all the rest of us. It will redefine what kind of a country the United States is, and how far the rest of the world can rely upon her to preserve the general safety and protect our civilization. "
" don’t recall any occasion, certainly not since the age of FDR, when so much partisan election material has been produced by intellectuals of the Left, not only in the United States but in Europe, especially in Britain, France, and Germany. These intellectuals—many of them with long and lugubrious records of supporting lost left-wing causes, from the Soviet empire to Castro’s aggressive adventures in Africa, and who have in their time backed Mengistu in Ethiopia, Qaddafi in Libya, Pol Pot in Cambodia, and the Sandinistas in Nicaragua—seem to have a personal hatred of Bush that defies rational analysis. "