Ummm..... ok. If you say so. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :eek2:Quote:
Originally posted by silencio
To the topic, UT2003 Sux
Printable View
Ummm..... ok. If you say so. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :eek2:Quote:
Originally posted by silencio
To the topic, UT2003 Sux
I do. :)
:bor: :eek2:Quote:
Originally posted by silencio
I do. :)
I think so too. The game just has no realism..Quote:
Originally posted by Tazdrummer
:bor: :eek2:
Ok. Thats what everyone looks for is realism. :eek:Quote:
Originally posted by silencio
I think so too. The game just has no realism..
If the Ghost Recon and SWAT and Army Recon are your cup of tea, more power to you bro. And if thats the case you are talking tactical shooters which is like talking apples and tomatoes here.
]Quote:
Originally posted by silencio
To the topic, UT2003 Sux
I had better not put this on our Intranet. Can you imagine the fallout. Check my profile if you dont know why.
It would be an all out monster :flame: war.
:D
Tazdrummer. Could you tell me if it would run half decently on my system?
Specs:
P3 800 MHz
Geforce 3 ti 200 128 MB
133 MHz fsb
384 PC133 SDRAM
Thanks.
Have you tried the demo? Thats the best way to see how it will run on yours. Also try the Americas Army game. It is supposed to be built on the UT 2003 engine.
You got a good chance with the GeForce 3. It should run good on yours I would think.
No, americas army is built on the original UT engine, and is optimized for a GF 2 as for his system specs, it should work pretty well as long as he dont crank all the effects to the max ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Tazdrummer
Have you tried the demo? Thats the best way to see how it will run on yours. Also try the Americas Army game. It is supposed to be built on the UT 2003 engine.
You got a good chance with the GeForce 3. It should run good on yours I would think.
I thought I had read somewhere that if you can run Americas Army you should be able to run UT2003 just fine.Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Dreamer
No, americas army is built on the original UT engine, and is optimized for a GF 2 as for his system specs, it should work pretty well as long as he dont crank all the effects to the max ;)
If he can run AA with no problem then UT2k3 should not be a problem, if the effects arent at max.
I can play AA on my PII 350 (768Mb PC100 RAM) using a GeForce 2 MX400 64Mb...
...and I strongly doubt I could run UT2003 with any semblance of playability.
But I'll just have to D/L the demo to test that theory now, won't I? :D
I doubt that you are playing that with effects to the max thoQuote:
Originally posted by a d e p t
I can play AA on my PII 350 (768Mb PC100 RAM) using a GeForce 2 MX400 64Mb...
...and I strongly doubt I could run UT2003 with any semblance of playability.
But I'll just have to D/L the demo to test that theory now, won't I? :D
Give it a shot, what have you got to loose? Don't forget to download the demo patch.Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Dreamer
If he can run AA with no problem then UT2k3 should not be a problem, if the effects arent at max.
BTW - I am an avid fan of both Quake3 and UT2003. If I had to choose one over the other I would say UT2003. But that is only because the engine is brand new. When DOOM III is released I'm sure it will dominate.
True - the only setting I can confirm at this time is the resolution of 800x600, but I don't think all the eye-candy is enabled.Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Dreamer
I doubt that you are playing that with effects to the max tho
So does this confirm that AA uses the UT2003 engine?
IF it has multiplay capability....... if the system requirement isnt TOOOOO high. UT2003 is pretty high but could Doom III be higher?Quote:
Originally posted by Poseidon
When DOOM III is released I'm sure it will dominate.