Printable View
Actually, the only stats that really matter are how many Vince Lombardi trophies you got piled up in the attic. :)
http://www.aggro-zone.com/windrivers/5timechamps.jpg
<a href="http://www.superbowl.com/xxxvi/history/records/team_games.html" target="_blank">In fact, check this link out...</a>
[quote]Originally posted by WebHead:
<strong>
True. Point taken. I should've probably looked at his stats first before saying that, I just couldn't think of anyone else at the time. And yeah, I agree, he's not useless. I definately chose the wrong word. I guess what I was trying to say by that, is that he had a few outstanding years back in SF, but then after that, he's just been an average RB. True, he's getting the 1000 yard seasons, but that's actually about average for a RB to get in a season. It's just a tough job, and nobody could possibly be expected to get more than 1 or 2 1500-2000 yard seasons in a career. And by saying all this, I'm just trying to point out what a tough job a RB has, and how hard it is on the body and how the body just can't do the job exceptionally year after year after year.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well, the only reason I knew them is from reading a report that had a headline about Watters being the most durable back the last few years.