Poll. Did Bush Mislead us about the Weapons of Mass Destruction.

thanks and by the way the point is the war back then NEVER ENDED. It was a cease fire while saddam complied to the UN stipulations. He did not therefore whether or not it was the stated reason we had PLENTY of reason to go in. If the UN won't uphold it's own decisions we might as well do it.... especially since we always get pulled in when the un screws up.....

Hi there,

Well, for Iraq, yes. But, don't the US have these kind of weapons at home? The thing that really bugs me if peoples like Bush used forces to stop other countries from having them, but in fact, they got themselves a few. Don't say they will never be used, but who knows.

If you're not going to used them, why bother keeping them and wasting money on it?

Ju Leon...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ya_know

No, Bush senior always wanted to oust Saddam, it was under the UN Decision and pressure on the coalition to stop advancing following the liberation of Kuwait.

---

So it was up to his son to find a way around the UN and do what his dad wanted?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cleetus

So it was up to his son to find a way around the UN and do what his dad wanted?

---

Sure, make the spin lefty...it's your own fabrication however.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ya_know

Sure, make the spin lefty...it's your own fabrication however.

---

Whatever, Republican lapdog :rolleyes:

I just want to see my name as the last poster in ever thread in Politicos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ilovetheusers

How does a trillion $$$ in drug traffic (I made that # up) occur in the most advanced nation in the world?

---

Drugs go to where the money is. We got the money.