View Poll Results: Should the U.S. attack Iraq?
- Voters
- 66. You may not vote on this poll
-
August 8th, 2002, 06:48 PM
#1
Registered User
Should the U.S. attack Iraq?
-
August 8th, 2002, 07:03 PM
#2
Senior Member - 1000+ Club
That's right Bush - Bomb the **** out of everything, and we'll wade in blindly after you.
Give me a reason?
I'm in charge and I say we blow it up
-
August 8th, 2002, 07:16 PM
#3
Registered User
Whoa! Someone voted "No"? I thought for sure this one would be unanimous.
IRAQ
-
August 8th, 2002, 07:29 PM
#4
Registered User
perhaps the one who voted no was saddam???
(just had to use that
i love peta...and sars...
and bin laden....and n. korea....and china...and p2p...spyware...
-
August 8th, 2002, 08:23 PM
#5
Registered User
Some people live an entire lifetime and wonder if they have ever made a difference in the world, but the Marines don't have that problem.- Ronald Reagan
-
August 8th, 2002, 09:13 PM
#6
Registered User
Here's a "See You In Hell, Sadaam" wave...
Spaceman Spiff sets his blaster to frappé...
-
August 8th, 2002, 09:41 PM
#7
Now is the wrong time to attack Iraq. We have no basis to do so... they haven't been implicated at all in the 9/11 attacks. I do agree with keeping up the sanctions imposed after the Gulf War... Iraq isn't living up to their agreement so the sanctions stay.... I don't wan't to hear any Iraqi person bitch about it. They didn't follow through with what was agreed at the end of the war.
Why do we need to attack them? We'll just be harming civilians who have no say in what their government does (just like us) and that will place us on the same level of terrorists.
Dubya says we should attack them because of them having biochem weapons... wake up folks, we have biochem weapons also. Hell, the FBI is tracing the Anthrax back to a US Government worker and where did he get this Anthrax... in a US Army lab. Now is the best time to stage an attack because it'll take the focus off all of the corporate scandals that W and his pal Cheney have their fingers in.
And all the dubya backers will come back with is "But Clinton got a BJ in the WhiteHouse"
I served my time in the Army and have seen combat, so you know I'd gladly die for my country but Iraq isn't invading any country this time.
The folks you should keep an eye on are the Saudis.
What we need to do is start getting our Oil from Russia and kiss the middle east goodbye.
Just my 2 cents
PS. I voted No
Last edited by j-man; August 8th, 2002 at 09:44 PM.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. - David St. Hubbins
-
August 8th, 2002, 09:52 PM
#8
Registered User
I just have one problem with Iraq. They won't let weapons inspectors come in there. Why not? Do they have something to hide? I say they do. And if they're hiding nuclear weapons, then something needs to be done about that. Either way, we're all in danger. At least if we attack we have a chance. I could take the tree-hugging attitude and say let's just stand by and see if they do anything. But the problem is,.. if they DO do anything, (hehe, I said doo doo) then it might just be too late for the planet as we know it. We're just standing by, letting them stockpile nuclear weapons. That is not something to just sit around and watch and not do anything about. However, as I do think we need to attack, I do also think Iraq is gonna be a helluva lot harder to beat than Afghanistan. So it's gonna be a messy war. What if your neighbor had bombs in his backyard, and you knew that he was a dangerous individual? Would you do anything about it? I would. I say attack, and attack NOW!
-
August 8th, 2002, 09:53 PM
#9
Registered User
Oh, and btw,.. one more thing. Speaking of treehuggers, I see we got alot of them voting in this thread.
-
August 8th, 2002, 10:09 PM
#10
Registered User
Absolutely
Last edited by Poseidon; August 8th, 2002 at 10:14 PM.
The early bird may get the worm; but the second mouse gets the cheese!
-
August 8th, 2002, 10:41 PM
#11
Registered User
"its not if they have the weapons now, its will they use them"
...I'd rather not see those used. We need to shove our foot up their a$$ again, and this time, take him out. No more of this lovey dovey "good guys" crap, down, low, and dirty. cup check all the way.
can ya tell I don't like Iraq?
-
August 8th, 2002, 11:14 PM
#12
Registered User
Originally posted by j-man
What we need to do is start getting our Oil from Russia and kiss the middle east goodbye.
Yep.
Live Free or Die
Never forget, never lose those who have been lost.
My Malinois is smarter than your honor roll student!
-
August 8th, 2002, 11:31 PM
#13
Registered User
Yes we need to attack ...
If you think there is going to be a fight, make sure there is one. Hit first, hit hard, make sure you win.
The Prince in two lines.
This is only the begging, this will be a very long road to peace.
We most also move off of oil. From the reading and research I have done, Hydrogen seems to be the best bet. How wonderful would it be to someday say that oil is a nonfactor when dealing with global policy.
"Don't Panic" in large friendly letters on the cover.
-
August 8th, 2002, 11:34 PM
#14
Registered User
we messed up the first time around...
turn them into glass....
i say helllls ya
i love peta...and sars...
and bin laden....and n. korea....and china...and p2p...spyware...
-
August 9th, 2002, 07:25 AM
#15
Registered User
I say we attack and replace the Iraqi government. If Hussein is stockpiling weapons of mass destruction he won't hesitate to use them against us and our interests, because he uses chemical weapons on his own people. He's up to no good.....Kill him
Why didn't we finish the job the first time???
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks