-
August 20th, 2005, 08:13 PM
#1
Memory broke?
I use wavelab for audio-editing. My pc is a p4 2.8, 768 memory. when i meta-normalize about 30 soundfiles, i sometimes get a blue screen which says, KERNEL_DATA_INPAGE_ERROR, this happened also this afternoon when i recorded a live recording of approx. 10 seconds, it loaded the visual wave when i stopped the recorded and..whoops: KERNEL_DATA_.....I now i want to save a single mp3 to wave rendering with a VST-effect on, wavelab says:"out of memory". do not understand it, is there something wrong with hardware or is my system not optimised somewhere to use wavelab?
Everything seems to works nice otherwise, using different softwares at the times or playing memory-intense games. Can my memory get broke?
-
August 20th, 2005, 09:44 PM
#2
Check free space on your system partition....To be exact check Page file size that should be approximately 1.5 * physical memory of system that makes it about 1200MB in your case.
-
August 20th, 2005, 10:24 PM
#3
I see it's 1152, so i can conclude that's fine (?). Just did a PC-scan which gave me next results:
Main BoardDescription Your Results
Brand/Model SiS Technology Inc. SiS661FX + SiS964
Type Desktop
Serial Number Not available
BIOS Phoenix Technologies, LTD 6.00 PG 12/15/2003
System Board http://www.abit.com.tw SG72(SIS 661FX-964L) V1.0
ProcessorDescription Your Results
Brand/Model Intel Pentium 4
Nominal Clock Speed 2800 MHz
Measured Clock Speed 2800 MHz
External Clock Speed 200 MHz
CPU Load Not tested (-2)
Speed Rating 4922 (111% of 14809 similar)
MEMORY:
RAM installed 768 MB
Windows RAM 768 MB
Total RAM slots 2
Available RAM slots 0
Max RAM module size 1024 MB
Memory Type 256+512;DIMM,SDRAM,|Synchronous;T16
Speed Rating 6401 MB/s (101% of 14809 similar)
Speed rating is measured in megabytes per second. The percentage indicates the performance of this system compared to systems in our database with a similar CPU and clock speed; the number of similar systems is also shown. For example, a score of 50% would indicate this system had half the performance of comparable systems; 200% would indicate twice the performance. A "normal" number is 100% plus or minus about 15%.
DISK
Partition format NTFS NTFS
Cluster size 4 KB 4 KB
Drive label No Label NieuwVolume
Size 38154 MB 76316 MB
Free space 16337 MB (43%) 14766 MB (19%)
Junk files 9 MB (0%) 411 MB (1%)
Data fragmentation 22% Not tested
File fragmentation 1% Not tested
Uncached speed 15 MB/s (37%) 16 MB/s (40%)
Percentages shown for free space and junk files (temporary files, browser cache, Recycle Bin files) represent the size relative to the total disk capacity. A disk with 50% free space is half-full (or half-empty, if you're an optimist).
Cached and uncached speed is measured in megabytes per second (MB/s). When a percentage is shown for cached and uncached speed, it compares the performance of the drive with those of systems in our database with the same processor and clock speed. (Our database currently has 14809 similar systems.) A rating of 200% means a disk is twice the performance of similar systems, 50% means it's half the performance. Cached disk speed generally measures the efficiency of the system's processor and memory system, not the performance of the hard disk. Uncached speed is most affected by the physical hard disk and the disk interface.
VIDEO
Brand/Model ATI RADEON 9600 Series
Resolution 1024x768 pixels
Colors 16 million
DirectX version 5.03.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
OpenGL version 5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
Acceleration options Enabled
Performance 118.73 MP/s (72% of 11 similar)
-
August 21st, 2005, 06:03 PM
#4
could be bad memory or bad sector on hdd,so i suggest get memtest utilitie it is free and a hdd diag proggy like powermax or from the maker of your hdd this is also free,good luck
Similar Threads
-
By syrdax in forum Laptops/PDAs/Smartphones
Replies: 5
Last Post: June 4th, 2005, 02:42 AM
-
By jaeger in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 17
Last Post: June 20th, 2002, 04:48 PM
-
By Homicide00 in forum BIOS/Motherboard Drivers
Replies: 6
Last Post: October 30th, 2001, 05:59 PM
-
By Lt. Columbo (formally Joevegany@..) in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 8
Last Post: July 9th, 2001, 05:37 AM
-
By Venus in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
Replies: 2
Last Post: June 11th, 2001, 05:53 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks