|
-
June 2nd, 2004, 01:25 PM
#1
DirectX for NT?
Is there a version of DirectX for Windows NT?
-
June 2nd, 2004, 01:44 PM
#2
Registered User
I am almost positive that Directx 3.0 was the highest NT could go. I believe it shipped with 2.0.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 01:45 PM
#3
Registered User
There was a hacked version later than 3.0 that would run on NT but I can't remember what version exactly.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 02:23 PM
#4
Registered User
3.0a also requires service pack 6.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 02:26 PM
#5
It only support directx 3.0? That is really lame.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 02:28 PM
#6
Has anyone else heard about the hacked version silencio talked about?
-
June 2nd, 2004, 02:45 PM
#7
Registered User
 Originally Posted by fixxxer575
Has anyone else heard about the hacked version silencio talked about?
It was buggy as hell.....try a Google search for it.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 02:49 PM
#8
I found a Quake site with a link to a hack version of directx:
http://www.solcon.nl/mwijers/news.htm
That link had a link to a hacked directx 9.0. I downloaded all the files but I dont know what to do with them. Can somebody check out this link and tell me what I have to do with these files to make them work?
Last edited by fixxxer575; June 2nd, 2004 at 03:19 PM.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 03:16 PM
#9
the files were called Direct3D9.zip, DirectDraw.zip, DirectInput9.zip, DirectPlay9.zip, and DirectShow9.zip. I looked in them and none of them have readme files. where should I Unzip these?
-
June 2nd, 2004, 03:17 PM
#10
Registered User
The link you posted is dead. Even if it wasn't, the hack is 7 years old and apparently doesn't work. See here: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e....se%26rnum%3D2
The short answer is that if you need to run a program requiring a current version of directx, you need to upgrade your os.
-
June 2nd, 2004, 03:26 PM
#11
Registered User
 Originally Posted by fixxxer575
It only support directx 3.0? That is really lame.
Well no - not really. You've got to look at it in context. NT is now a very old OS. When launched in '94 or thereabouts, it was intended as a stable platform for workstations - office machines. This meant that fast graphics were not a priority.
Win 95, launched a bit later, was the OS intended for domestic use.
By and large, though some might take issue with me here, NT has, over the years, performed its designed purppose adequately, many of our (corporate) customers still use it quite happily.
If you want to run programs that require a higher version of DirectX, you really need to upgrade your OS to at least Win98SE....Assuming the computer will handle it.
John
Now where did I leave my Lump Hammer?
"I thought I was wrong once" - "But I was wrong"
-
June 4th, 2004, 02:36 AM
#12
Registered User
DiectX 3.0 is part of Service Pack 3 for NT4.0. Prior to installing SP3, NT had no DirectX support, SP3 was a major upgrade to NT. And MS felt that DX3 was all NT4 needed, and did not make any official upgrades to directX support for it past ver 3.0 (I remember waiting for sp3 to come out so that i could play Mechwarrior2 and other games of the time on NT :-P )
Similar Threads
-
By Kaltag in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 3
Last Post: May 8th, 2003, 07:59 AM
-
By techs in forum Video Adapter/Monitor Drivers
Replies: 1
Last Post: March 23rd, 2002, 01:15 PM
-
By Orangeman in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
Replies: 3
Last Post: March 7th, 2002, 04:50 AM
-
By Tselakus in forum Video Adapter/Monitor Drivers
Replies: 2
Last Post: February 7th, 2001, 08:38 AM
-
By Jean-Paul Bulot in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
Replies: 2
Last Post: October 25th, 1999, 04:17 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks