|
-
December 5th, 2000, 08:03 AM
#1
Whats your take on the Durons?
Morning All,
Thought I would start a thread seeing what the general tech feeling on the Duron is. I personally have been impressed with their speed and reliability(this coming from an Intel DIE-HARD). Although they tend to get a little overheated, you can get an 800MHZ CPU for around $100. Unbelievable!
------------------
"What do you think of them Compaq Presarios?"
"Well sir, I personally wouldn't buy any product whose middle name is sorry"
-
December 5th, 2000, 05:05 PM
#2
Well, I've got a 700Mhz one and haven't considered getting an athlon yet.
Nuff said
-
December 5th, 2000, 07:20 PM
#3
I know the feeling dude. I've been an Intel guy since the Pentium days but, everytime I read anything about benchmarking and testing between Celerons and Durons it shows me the Duron kicks the the Celeron's *ss. I don't know. I haven't broken down yet but, I'm leaning towards it everyday I look at my P2 400 and my wallet. As much as I've loved Intel over the last few years. It looks like AMD has the upperhand on the testing and word of mouth. Time to build another machine and find out!
------------------
Hey? Why is my computer promting me if I would like to accept a cookie? Is it Oatmeal or Chocolate Chip?
-
December 6th, 2000, 02:07 PM
#4
Fast ,Cheap ,and bang for your buck what more can you ask for?
------------------
~If you can't walk the walk don't even try to talk the talk~
-
December 6th, 2000, 02:09 PM
#5
Not for the gammer, but I am all the way AMD, They put more money into development and lowering end user prices, instead of paying blue guys to do dumb stuff. The Duron is The best bang for your buck!!!
-
December 6th, 2000, 07:00 PM
#6
I won't touch them for reasons posted previously on the Forums, same with the Athlons.
The main reason is that the Motherboards are still not reliable enough for me. Until AMD and the chipset manufacturers come up with a combination that is as stable as the Intel combinations, I will stick to selling Intel based systems only. Also had a very high failure rate compared to the quantities sold in comparison wiht Intel CPU's.
One man's opinions and it works for me.
------------------
Visit my BRAND NEW Site from the 4th November 2000.
The Carpers Lodge.net
The Webs Number One Resource for Today's Carp Angler.
-
December 6th, 2000, 08:05 PM
#7
-
December 6th, 2000, 09:11 PM
#8
I have built a couple and I have had no complants! But My personal every day system has a PIII 1Gig. But next month it will be a PIV 1.5 Gb. 
------------------
If all else fails read the directions !
-
December 6th, 2000, 09:31 PM
#9
I see another thread turned into an AMD vs. Intel again...how fun!!
------------------
You spend your whole life believing that you're on the right track,
only to discover that you're on the wrong train.
-
December 6th, 2000, 11:11 PM
#10
Originally posted by Darren Wilson:
I won't touch them for reasons posted previously on the Forums, same with the Athlons.
The main reason is that the Motherboards are still not reliable enough for me. Until AMD and the chipset manufacturers come up with a combination that is as stable as the Intel combinations, I will stick to selling Intel based systems only. Also had a very high failure rate compared to the quantities sold in comparison wiht Intel CPU's.
I don't know what to tell you, but between Athlons and Durons, I've built about 100 thunderbird-based systems. I've NEVER had a low-quality problem with the processors. THe boards, yeah, but only because my boss at the time lived by FIC motherboards. I personally use Microstar and Asus, and they're great (The Microstar Athlon boards are the absolute most stable around, actually)
I implore you to check these components out (and make sure you have proper cooling on your CPU) and then reconsider your opinion.
------------------
Bryan Pizzuti
CompTIA A+, CNAP
[email protected]
-
December 6th, 2000, 11:12 PM
#11
Originally posted by Larommi:
I see another thread turned into an AMD vs. Intel again...how fun!!
At least is isn't as childish as the Bush-Gore thing....yet.
------------------
Bryan Pizzuti
CompTIA A+, CNAP
[email protected]
-
December 7th, 2000, 08:11 AM
#12
AMD Duron is the equivalent of an Intel Celeron. It would not be fair to compare it against a P3 or anything. Keeping that in mind, Duron is the superior choice.
More Speed, More Value
------------------
Say what?
-
December 7th, 2000, 08:30 AM
#13
I have to admit, I haven't ever even seen a Duron and to date we've only sold 4 Athlons.
We might not be giving them a fair try, but we had so many headaches with the K6-2 line, that we just quit selling AMD at all, unless a customer comes specifically requesting them.
------------------
Why do convenience stores that are open 24/7 have locks on the doors?
-
December 7th, 2000, 09:40 AM
#14
Originally posted by 3fingersalute:
I have to admit, I haven't ever even seen a Duron and to date we've only sold 4 Athlons.
We might not be giving them a fair try, but we had so many headaches with the K6-2 line, that we just quit selling AMD at all, unless a customer comes specifically requesting them.
ditto....
-
December 7th, 2000, 10:22 AM
#15
you can compare the duron and PIII, however, because in some things, like mpeg4 creation, the duron will actually beat a pIII of equal or higher clock speed. I saw an article about it somewhere on tom's hardware.
------------------
I was going to be a procrastinator, I just never got around to it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks