I've been having an argument with a cow-worker about our deployment strategy. I've got a perfectly good sysprep image made, which automatically configures the machine to join the domain, generate a random computer name, etc. He insists that sysprep can't be trusted, and that we've got to use Drive Image or Ghost to make a reliable image. He's been around a lot longer than I have, so maybe he knows something about sysprep that I don't. Has anyone had any problems with sysprep in W2K? Were there big problems with MS deployment tools in NT, and that's why he's skeptical?