|
-
April 1st, 2004, 12:22 PM
#1
Registered User
Fetal Protection Bill to be signed.
Someday there will be a question on the SAT’s asking:
Select the one that doesn’t belong:
1863 Lincoln issues Emancipation Proclamation
1949 Truman issues executive order integrating the military
1963 Johnson signs Voting Rights act
2004 Bush signs Fetal Protection Bill
But my real problems with this are:
1) It takes effect on conception not on fetal viability
2) It will probably lead to (imho) criminal penalties for smoking, drinking, etc while pregnant. Maybe even penalties for not providing adequate nutritional care.
Similar Threads
-
By Stalemate in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 10
Last Post: July 5th, 2003, 10:15 AM
-
By Sowulo in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 3
Last Post: March 9th, 2002, 06:01 PM
-
By FanBlade01 in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 3
Last Post: November 25th, 2001, 04:20 PM
-
By Bassoprofundo in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
Replies: 1
Last Post: February 7th, 2001, 07:21 PM
-
By Jackel in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 1
Last Post: December 9th, 1999, 10:29 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks