View Poll Results: Which of the following, if any, get cut?
- Voters
- 31. You may not vote on this poll
-
Anne - Female, 32, 3 sons, 12, 9, and 6. Husband killed in house fire, insurance company refused to pay out. NOT seeking work; child care is too expensive to make it worthwhile.
-
Bob - 52, male. Cannot work due to repetitive stress injury; company he worked for folded, has a car but no savings due to stock losses. NOT seeking work; has failed three times at vocational retraining programs.
-
Carla - 21, female. Two kids by unknown fathers, ex drug addict, in a rehab and high school equivalency program, SEEKING work but can't find it due to terrible resume, criminal record, and tattoos.
-
Dave - 37, male. Mentally challenged. NOT REALLY seeking work, as he doesn't understand he needs to, and nobody will hire Dave because he has the intellect of a 7 year old.
-
I would keep all of the above on benefits.
-
August 3rd, 2004, 12:29 AM
#1
Registered User
Which of these (hypothetical) people would you cut from welfare benefits?
Okay, I am providing four "case examples" of hypothetical people living on welfare. I honestly want to know which of these four people the Windrivers crew demographically believe should be cut their welfare benefits.
(You can check more than one if you feel more than one should be cut.)
If you want more information regarding a specific "case", post a question here, and we will decide for the case of argument what the hypothetical answer to your question is.
There is a box provided for those who believe all the cases should be kept on benefits as well.
Similar Threads
-
By Wayward Clam in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 187
Last Post: April 24th, 2003, 01:53 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks