Short date versus long date
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Short date versus long date

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Fort Mill, SC, US
    Posts
    30

    Post Short date versus long date

    We are preparing for Y2K and are wondering if it matters if Windows is setup for short date or long date. Do windows programs pull the date from Windows or do they pull it from the BIOS or does it matter. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Registered User AlienDyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Athens, GREECE
    Posts
    3,772

    Post

    Try a Y2K upgrade for Windows. You can check it at Microsoft's site.

    ------------------
    God created human.
    Human created computers.
    God got mad and created customers!!!!!



  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Pitman, NJ USA
    Posts
    568

    Post

    The date display in the regional settings in Windows does NOT affect application operation or the operating system itself. The only thing that it affects is the way the date is displayed to the user, either in 2- or 4- digit format.
    For a Y2K patch of the Windows 95 operating system, go to http://www.microsoft.com/windows95/d...t.asp?site=95. Windows 98SE has the Y2K patches applied, and the Customer Service Pack for Win98 contains the patches as well. Also, SP5 or better for Windows NT 4.0 applies Y2K patches to that OS. (SP4 supposedly brought NT 4.0 up to compliance, but it missed a few things.)

    Hope this helps (-:

    ------------------
    R. Bret Walker, CNE


    R. Bret Walker, CNE
    (I'm not a Master Tech, but I play one on TV)

    Wondering what videos to rent this weekend? Check out The People's Reviews, movie reviews written for the people and by the people.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Pitman, NJ USA
    Posts
    568

    Post

    You know, speaking of Y2K, I just got info on the beta release of SP3 for GroupWise 5.5 (Novell's e-mail and groupware package). SP2 was supposed to cover all Y2K issues, but one of the things that SP3 does is to add February 29 to the 2000 calendar. Go figure (-:
    I guess they had January 1 covered, and figured they'd get around to the rest of the year later LOL.

    ------------------
    R. Bret Walker, CNE



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •