|
-
August 21st, 2001, 06:59 AM
#1
Network in Windows 2000
Im using Windows 2000 Server Service Pack 2 in our computer shop, the problem is ... then i access the workstations .. (which is using Windows 98 SE) it is too slow !!! but if im accessing Windows 2000 Professional/Server its fast.
Im using a CNET LAN card 10/100 MBPS and a CNET Switch, and i have a total of .. 12 PC's
-
August 21st, 2001, 07:59 AM
#2
Use wins, or try using netbeui for testing.
if it works with netbeui, then it is a tcp/ip problem.
most likley it has to do with win2k looking for the "scheduled items" and "printers" folder names on the 9x boxes.
If you think that is slow, try a mixed Novell / Win2k environment. Using a unc does not cut it.
(win2k pro for the desktop, mixed novell and win2k servers)
-
August 21st, 2001, 08:51 AM
#3
Is the switch 10/100?
Also try setting both NIC cards to Full 100 duplex and set the IPX to 802.3
-
August 21st, 2001, 08:53 AM
#4
[quote]Originally posted by kannibul:
<strong>Use wins, or try using netbeui for testing.
if it works with netbeui, then it is a tcp/ip problem.
most likley it has to do with win2k looking for the "scheduled items" and "printers" folder names on the 9x boxes.
If you think that is slow, try a mixed Novell / Win2k environment. Using a unc does not cut it.
(win2k pro for the desktop, mixed novell and win2k servers)</strong><hr></blockquote>
Wanna know whats really slow, a NT/Novell domain with Windows 2000 Workstations on dual IP. Wow now thats slow. Dual IP is so slow.
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...uts/athlon.gif
Do you leak any fluids, do you have any bumps on your rear, do you have any unpleasant odors?
If you answered yes to any of these then you are not qualified to own a new AMD ATHLON XP.
If someone ask you if you are running the all-new fastest AMD ATHLON XP, just turn around and reply "WHY YES, AND ITS CERTIFIED"
http://www.daemonprojects.com/
-
August 21st, 2001, 09:21 AM
#5
How do you have the server configured? is it a domain controller? is it a dhcp server or are your ips staticly assigned?
-
August 24th, 2001, 02:35 PM
#6
[quote]Originally posted by Weazel:
<strong>How do you have the server configured? is it a domain controller? is it a dhcp server or are your ips staticly assigned?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Nope it is not a domain controler, i didn't touch the dhcp server and my ips are automatically assigned.
-
August 24th, 2001, 02:38 PM
#7
[quote]Originally posted by Daemon:
<strong>Is the switch 10/100?
Also try setting both NIC cards to Full 100 duplex and set the IPX to 802.3</strong><hr></blockquote>
The switch is 10/100, all PC's are using CAT 5. i didn't enable the IPX, should i enable it?
-
August 24th, 2001, 02:39 PM
#8
[quote]Originally posted by kannibul:
<strong>Use wins, or try using netbeui for testing.
if it works with netbeui, then it is a tcp/ip problem.
most likley it has to do with win2k looking for the "scheduled items" and "printers" folder names on the 9x boxes.
If you think that is slow, try a mixed Novell / Win2k environment. Using a unc does not cut it.
(win2k pro for the desktop, mixed novell and win2k servers)</strong><hr></blockquote>
Hmm.. that's new! how do i do that ?
-
August 25th, 2001, 03:37 AM
#9
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks