[RESOLVED] Me clocks my CPU
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: [RESOLVED] Me clocks my CPU

  1. #1
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Question Me clocks my CPU

    Has anyone ever noticed Win Me clocking their processor? I replaced '98 the other day and for some reason Me is clocking my PII-400. I've checked the temps and bios - bios says 400MHz, and it is above normal temperatures. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Clackamas, OR USA
    Posts
    5,422

    Post

    Originally posted by ringo2143z:
    Has anyone ever noticed Win Me clocking their processor? I replaced '98 the other day and for some reason Me is clocking my PII-400. I've checked the temps and bios - bios says 400MHz, and it is above normal temperatures. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    I have no idea what you mean. How is WinMe 'clocking' your processor?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Portland, OR , USA
    Posts
    37

    Post

    Uhh, If you mean overclocking your processor than maybe it is because you run a 3d game or something very cpu intensive. I dont know if it is even possible for ME to set the clocks on your processor, so maybe your just paranoid.

    Install a better cooling system if what you got doesn't keep it at "normal" temps.

  4. #4
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    I've checked the temps when it's idling and they're above normal for the 400MHz clock. DirectX and other CPU speed testers say that it's running at 412MHz, not much, but enough to cause nasty heat.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Isleton, Calif, USA
    Posts
    463

    Cool

    Check and see what you have running in the back ground as far as heat is concerned. The OS can't over clock the system. If it is misreporting the speed then there is a good chanch it is misreporting the temp. Clock controled by Bios or pinned as you didnt give enough info. Both 98 and ME often give incorrect readings.

  6. #6
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    The clock speed is bios controlled. Before with '98, the PC idled at 32C, now it's somewhere around 36C, suggesting a bit of overclocking. Don't get me wrong, I've dabbled with the CPU speed before, it's just I have to run it at 400MHz nowadays to get other things to run (like my CD-RW). I've checked the speed with CPUID, DirectX 8 and SiSoft Sandra 2001, and they all report 412MHz. Temps are monitored with a HW monitor which came with the M-board, which hasn't been wrong so far.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Clackamas, OR USA
    Posts
    5,422

    Post

    Originally posted by ringo2143z:
    The clock speed is bios controlled. Before with '98, the PC idled at 32C, now it's somewhere around 36C, suggesting a bit of overclocking. Don't get me wrong, I've dabbled with the CPU speed before, it's just I have to run it at 400MHz nowadays to get other things to run (like my CD-RW). I've checked the speed with CPUID, DirectX 8 and SiSoft Sandra 2001, and they all report 412MHz. Temps are monitored with a HW monitor which came with the M-board, which hasn't been wrong so far.
    True an overclocked CPU will run hotter than it did when set at its default speed but that doesn't mean any CPU running hotter is overclocked. You changed your OS and the CPU is working harder than it did before, therefore--hotter. More speed will equal hotter temperatures but hotter temperatures do not define higher speed.

  8. #8
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    I acquired a copy of SoftFSB to play with, and when it loads and detects the FSB of 103MHz which would give the 412MHz. Further fiddling allows a change back to 400 or up to 448, which detect properly in all my speed utils. Ideas & suggestions?

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Circle Pines,MN,USA
    Posts
    805

    Post

    I don't mean to sound mean, but buy more fans if your concerned about it. I wouldn't really worry about it myself until you notice a performance hit from the heat. If you really concerned about heat underclock your cpu.

  10. #10
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    fans are a good suggestion, but I have filled my case with 10 already. i guess the heat isn't as serious as other people experience, but I'm not happy about it since I like to overclock sometimes.

  11. #11
    Registered User tablesalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Nashua, NH
    Posts
    174

    Post

    412MHz won't kill it. One thing to look at is some mainboards have a setting in the BIOS to boost performance by upping the FSB a few MHz, I had an Abit BX6 rev 2 that did this by adding 3MHz so in turn my P3 500 was running at 515MHz, not a huge difference and the heat was negligable. Even now my Athlon 900 is being as reported as running at 908MHz, I'm perfectly happy to leave it alone.

  12. #12
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    fair enough. i'll leave it for the time being until it causes a problem. cheers

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    269

    Smile

    10 fans? I hope you have a great power supply

  14. #14
    ringo2143z
    Guest

    Post

    They all spin alright, so that's ok. Most of them are in parallel and I've checked things out with my electronic engineer of a brother, so no probs there.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Swindon,Wiltshire,England
    Posts
    13

    Talking

    Hey Ringo,a little poem for your sheep mate.
    Mary had a little lamb who's fleece was thick and whispy,
    It diagnosed with foot and mouth so now it's black and crispy!!
    Seriously mate what the hell do you need with 10 fans running a PII 400?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •