Policeware, saving intelectual rights, or oppresion?
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Policeware, saving intelectual rights, or oppresion?

  1. #1
    Registered User *SlyVenom*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,034

    Post Policeware, saving intelectual rights, or oppresion?

    <a href="http://www.stoppoliceware.org/" target="_blank">http://www.stoppoliceware.org/</a>

    How do you feel about policeware?

  2. #2
    Registered User jay015's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    534

    Thumbs down

    Big Brother anyone????

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    8,442

    Post

    The ACLU would never let something like this slide. It might get passed, but would be in the supreme court within a year. I bet with the right backing it would easily be overturned and deemed unconstitutional. But it is really scarry that they keep pushing for this stuff, you know Ashcroft is licking his lips for laws like this.

  4. #4
    Registered User *SlyVenom*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,034

    Post

    [quote]
    <strong>WHO COULD GO TO JAIL?

    You, if you're one of the millions of Americans who uses your computers to burn music CD's, listen to MP3's, share video files, etc. You'd face up to five years in federal prison and a $500,000 fine.

    Think you'd be able to get around the law by removing the
    policeware from your personal computer? Think again -- anyone who defies the government by disabling or tampering with the policeware on their own computer, in the privacy of their own home or business, would also face five years in the slammer.

    Since alternative operating systems like Linux and FreeBSD
    would most likely refuse to incorporate government policeware into their code, users of these open-source systems would also be eligible for hard time.</strong><hr></blockquote>


    I think the last paragraph bothered me the most.
    people would definatley die over this...

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    561

    Post

    This is old, and wasn't passed. They can try again and again, but it still wont be passed. Theres no reason to be an alarmist.

  6. #6
    Registered User +Daemon+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    RC, Ca
    Posts
    3,406

    Post

    this will not pass y?

    Its bad to have everyone against you than having the RIAA against you

  7. #7
    Registered User *SlyVenom*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,034

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by gxavier:
    <strong>This is old, and wasn't passed. They can try again and again, but it still wont be passed. Theres no reason to be an alarmist.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    "The cynics are right nine times out of ten. "
    - Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956)

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    1,569

    Cool

    it is just a matter of time before something like this is passed. i don't understand the concern expressed here though. time and time again subjects like this have been brought up in these forums and no one seems to care. cameras are everywhere...email is read...bank accounts and purchases are tracked...and now the government wants the wireless companies to track the whereabouts of cell users and give them the info. so what is another small intrusion?

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    561

    Post

    This has been turned down in congress already twice. Neither Democrat or Republican would vote for this. Im not a cynic, I just know the truth. We would ban guns before this would be passed.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Posts
    1,639

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by gxavier:
    <strong>This has been turned down in congress already twice. Neither Democrat or Republican would vote for this. Im not a cynic, I just know the truth. We would ban guns before this would be passed.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    I dunno about that. The people chasing this sort of control, are generally the ones that least understand it. I bet you they understand guns.. point, click, bang, and its your constitutional right to have one. But computers?.. arent they something those damn communists use ?.. better put some control on them..

  11. #11
    Registered User *SlyVenom*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,034

    Post

    [quote]Originally posted by gxavier:
    <strong>This has been turned down in congress already twice. Neither Democrat or Republican would vote for this. Im not a cynic, I just know the truth. We would ban guns before this would be passed.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Perhaps you misunderstood me,

    without cynics like myself, this world would be surprised on a regular basis.
    Someone has to point these things out.
    We can't let our own government try to sneak cr@p like this by us.

    I will always fight for anti-opression, no matter what form it takes.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •