Fingerprint security defeated by gummy bear
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Fingerprint security defeated by gummy bear

  1. #1
    Registered User Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,224

    Smile Fingerprint security defeated by gummy bear

    OK weve recnetly had the latest CD antipiracy defeated by felt tip pens and sticky tape now to cap it all we`ve got Gummi bears defeating fingerprint sensors :

    <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/25300.html" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/25300.html</a>
    Qoute:
    "Tsutomu Matsumoto used gelatine and a plastic mould to create a fake finger, which he found fooled fingerprint detectors four times out of five.

    He took latent fingerprints from a glass, which he enhanced with a cyanoacrylate adhesive (super-glue fumes) and photographed with a digital camera. Using PhotoShop, he improved the contrast of the image and printed the fingerprint onto a transparency sheet.

    Matsumoto took a photo-sensitive printed-circuit board (which can be found in many electronic hobby shops) and used the fingerprint transparency to etch the fingerprint into the copper.

    From this he made a gelatine finger using the print on the PCB, using the same process as before. Again this fooled fingerprint detectors about 80 per cent of the time. "

  2. #2
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120

    Post

    If human ingenuity can create it, human ingenuity can defeat it - as long as you have enough time, money and knowledge.

    I'm just surprised fingerprinting could be so "easily" foiled! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />

  3. #3
    Registered User edball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,884

    Post

    It didn't seem real easy, still...it's a vicious cycle.

  4. #4
    Registered User MacGyver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    4,232

    Post

    Retinal scans won't be defeated so easily. You can't make an exact copy of your eye!

  5. #5
    Registered User Commander Klarg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    IKV Decapitator - A
    Posts
    756

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MacGyver:
    <strong>Retinal scans won't be defeated so easily. You can't make an exact copy of your eye!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Great, then they will pop your eye out to get past security.

  6. #6
    Registered User Fubarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    1,117

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MacGyver:
    <strong>Retinal scans won't be defeated so easily. You can't make an exact copy of your eye!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">just remember that all security measures can be broken....ALL of them

  7. #7
    Registered User Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,224

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Great, then they will pop your eye out to get past security </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well no actually,as they also have inbuilt security features to look for live retina to stop you gouging someones eye out and thus gain access.
    The one thought that does comes to mind is that if you cant access the machine then you simply hack the refference date it uses.

  8. #8
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120

    Post

    <a href="http://www.heise.de/ct/english/02/11/114/" target="_blank">Biometric Access Protection Devices and their Programs Put to the Test</a> gives an excellent rundown of these biometric devices and their shortfalls.

    Long read, but very informative. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

  9. #9
    Registered User Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    4,224

    Post

    Nice link,just shows how far a little bit of tinkering with basic ingredients can get you.
    Even the USB snooping link seems to show what a security hazard it is on all new systems.
    I did read of a similar device that fitted between the keyboard and its port enabling the logging of all input.
    Seems no win situation for an admin against a detrmined intruder.

  10. #10
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120

    Post

    </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Archer:
    <strong>...Seems no win situation for an admin against a detrmined intruder.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">We may not be able to keep them out, but for them not to leave traces identifying their presence is almost impossible.

    ...unless you're dealing with a l337 scumbag. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •