Pentium II 350Mhz or Celeron 500 which is faster?
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Pentium II 350Mhz or Celeron 500 which is faster?

  1. #1
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463

    Pentium II 350Mhz or Celeron 500 which is faster?

    Which do you all think is faster for general usage-- a Pentium II 350Mhz with 100Mhz bus or Celeron 500Mhz with the 66Mhz bus.

    I am thinking the Pentium II because of the better bus and more cache, but wanted your opinions.

    Thanks...

  2. #2
    Registered User Stalemate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    d4-e5
    Posts
    15,120
    If you are considering overclocking at all, the Mendocina Celerons are hard to beat.

    In any case, I'd go with the Celeron without hesitation.

    Here and here are some reasons why.
    Last edited by a d e p t; July 25th, 2002 at 07:27 PM.

  3. #3
    Tech-To-Tech Mod kato2274's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Bentleyville, Pa
    Posts
    2,317

    I agree With Adept

    I'd go with the celeron too!

  4. #4
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463
    Nope, sadly these machines are both prebuilts the Celeron is a Compaq, the P2 is a Gateway...

    I got the Celeron for free...

    Overclocking aside...which is faster?
    Last edited by JungleMan1; July 25th, 2002 at 09:39 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User -Senectus-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Kalgoorlie
    Posts
    305
    P2 Is much better at FPM (Floating Point Maths ) and that mean it will be better at scientific calculation and 3D graphics (games)
    Apart from that.. its up to you..

  6. #6
    Registered User WebHead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,208
    It's funny you should mention these exact processors cuz I actually saw the difference awhile back at my old job. The celery was definately much much more responsive. I've always kinda preferred PII and PIII, but when I saw that, I definately changed my views on celerons. See, my boss is the one who did this. He had a P2 350 and upgraded to the celeron 500 (which at the time, those were both awesome cpu's). Anyway, I used his PC alot and just noticed quite an improvement. Although, memory and video cards, imo, play a big role in this type of comparison too.
    Hello World

  7. #7
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463
    Yeah, the machine I choose will be running mostly office apps and surfing the Internet-- maybe playing some MP3s too. No gaming.

    Thanks.

  8. #8
    Chat Operator Matridom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,778
    Compaq or gareway, wich is the lesser evil?

    Personaly, i'd think they are about even. The p3-350 will have 512k cach and hum along at the 100 MhZ bus

    the celeron is faster, but has a slower bus and less cach.. Personaly i'd go with the p3, you can always pop in a faster CPU since it's slot rather then the PPGA that the celeron would use. (i'm assuming the celeron is on a PPGA board and knowing compaq, it is).

    Now if they are both slot boards, it's a pure toss up, I'd look at the other features available

    Edit:. just noticed you said P2 and not P3.. go with the celeron.. they run almost the indentical core (the celeron mendecino runs the p2 core with onboard cach)
    Last edited by Matridom; July 25th, 2002 at 10:13 PM.
    <Ferrit> Take 1 live chicken, cut the head off, dance around doing the hokey pokey and chanting: GO AWAY BAD VIRUS, GO AWAY BAD VIRUS
    -----------------------
    Windows 7 Pro x64
    Asus P5QL Deluxe
    Intel Q6600
    nVidia 8800 GTS 320
    6 gigs of Ram
    2x60 gig OCZ Vertex SSD (raid 0)
    WD Black 750 gig
    Antec Tri power 750 Watt PSU
    Lots of fans

  9. #9
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463
    The Gateway hasn't been too bad, I definitely wouldn't touch them again but it has been pretty much problem free.

    Yes the Compaq is PPGA.

    How much cache does the Celeron have, is it 128K? I can probably find out with HWInfo but am too lazy to hook up the thing right now...heh.

  10. #10
    Chat Operator Matridom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,778
    Originally posted by JungleMan1
    The Gateway hasn't been too bad, I definitely wouldn't touch them again but it has been pretty much problem free.

    Yes the Compaq is PPGA.

    How much cache does the Celeron have, is it 128K? I can probably find out with HWInfo but am too lazy to hook up the thing right now...heh.
    yup, 128k full speed.

  11. #11
    Senior Member - 1000+ Club Outcoded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in the UK, never quite sure where
    Posts
    1,689
    Originally posted by JungleMan1
    Yeah, the machine I choose will be running mostly office apps and surfing the Internet-- maybe playing some MP3s too. No gaming.

    Thanks.
    For that kind of work, you'd hardly see the difference between a Smelleron and a P2 with similar clock speeds. Given an extra 150MHz, go with the Celeron.

  12. #12
    Registered User Akuma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The Void
    Posts
    826
    Comcr@p or Gateway!?? There is an interesting choice. Personally, I would either build my own or order a custom from Dell. That is just my 2 cents on the issue.

    Regarding the processor, it would all depend on what you are doing. Side by side, with the same speed, Pentium will perform better if multi-tasking is a big issue. But one program @ a time, Celeron will out perform the Pentium. Personally, I would have to say Celeron. Despite the lower bus speed, the processing speed will win this race in the end.

  13. #13
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463
    Originally posted by Akuma
    Comcr@p or Gateway!?? There is an interesting choice. Personally, I would either build my own or order a custom from Dell. That is just my 2 cents on the issue.
    Yeap, I already have my own custom built rig, as shown in my signature-- I just have these two spare machines and not sure which one to keep for myself. My dad's taking one of them, and I'm keeping the fastest one for myself.

    Looks like the Celeron it is, unless anyone begs to differ...
    Last edited by JungleMan1; July 26th, 2002 at 09:18 AM.

  14. #14
    Adm¡nistrator JungleMan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    2,463
    Originally posted by crazyman


    what? Mr AMD has two intel boxes!?!?!?!?!
    So pity me the Compaq I got for free

    Speaking of AMD I am loving this XP1600 AGOIA that overclocks to 1.74 on air, it can probably go higher.

  15. #15
    Registered User Akuma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The Void
    Posts
    826
    Originally posted by JungleMan1


    So pity me the Compaq I got for free
    Well, you got what you paid for!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •