RAM being misreported
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: RAM being misreported

  1. #1
    Registered User mrwilhelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Modesto, CA.
    Posts
    364

    RAM being misreported

    OK, here's the scenario:

    I had a brand new stick of 256 MB PC133 RAM lying around so I decided to stick it in my 1GHz box (BE6-2 w/ 256MB already installed). For some reason it keeps showing up as only 131 MB on this PC. I try it in another PC and it's fine. If I pull the original stick of RAM (which is the same brand as the stick in question BTW) and go with the new one it's still reported as only 131 MB. I've tried playing musical slots to no avail.

    Like I said, both sticks are the same brand (Kingston). The only difference is the older stick uses 16 16 MB chips while the new stick has only one side populated with 8 32 MB chips. Does the 440BX chipset only support 16 MB memory chips? If so that would explain it.

    This isn't a big deal since the system in question runs fine with 256 MB, but naturally I'm kind of curious.

    BTW, it is using the latest (and probably last) BIOS.

    Any ideas?
    Last edited by mrwilhelm; January 11th, 2003 at 03:14 AM.
    "Without fools there would be no wisdom."

  2. #2
    Intel Mod Platypus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,783
    You're right.

    Quote:

    " 8 ram chips per module, each chip organized as 32Mx8. Newer quality Dimms feature such organization, but they will not work on bx-based boards."

    From here:

    http://n.ethz.ch/student/sroland/ram...ome_256MB_high

  3. #3
    Registered User mrwilhelm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Modesto, CA.
    Posts
    364

    It figures...

    Well that certainly solves the mystery. I'll tell ya... the longer I do this stuff, the dumber I feel!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •