|
-
March 11th, 2003, 03:03 PM
#1
Registered User
windows server 2003
I just got a invite to attend a launch event for server 2003, if I go I get a free evaluation copy. And other event like this that I have gone to I got free food, pens, and entered in drawings for other cool stuff
-
March 11th, 2003, 05:28 PM
#2
Registered User
I've played with Server 2003 briefly. It looks like Windows 2000 server with an XP faceplate...
whoopie-do.
..but I do want a new pen..
-
March 11th, 2003, 10:27 PM
#3
Flabooble!
Originally posted by drewmaztech
I've played with Server 2003 briefly. It looks like Windows 2000 server with an XP faceplate...
whoopie-do.
..but I do want a new pen..
Oh so they found a way to screw that one up too huh?
Why does a server interface need to be pretty? Really, how dumb is that? It's just going to suck up resources and get turned off.
-
March 12th, 2003, 08:58 AM
#4
Registered User
That's the first thing I did. I turned all the prettiness off - then I ended up with.... Windows 2000 Server.
I didn't find it any faster, either.
-
March 12th, 2003, 09:20 AM
#5
Banned
Is there anything new in the Active Directory features?
-
March 13th, 2003, 01:12 PM
#6
yes, several things actually.
-
March 13th, 2003, 01:16 PM
#7
Registered User
The best part is getting the free stuff, but the t shirts never fit me
-
March 13th, 2003, 01:21 PM
#8
Banned
Originally posted by Spawn_X
yes, several things actually.
If you are waiting for me to ask...
Please share what you_know...
-
March 13th, 2003, 02:01 PM
#9
no sense of humor today eh?
1. .NET Server 2003 addresses caches the user's complete group membership in the DC at first log-on. That way, it can validate subsequent log-ons from the DC cache instead of requiring a connection to a GC server.
2. Another improvement is the ability to have a backup file—instead of the GC server—provide the data for an initial replication request for a new DC. This certainly comes in handy if your link to the GC server is less than speedy. After initial installation, a mere replication of changes is required to get this feature running—which can be a real time-saver in a disaster recovery situation.
taken from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,764745,00.asp
when i said several new things i was speaking from what i heard/saw about a year ago, but since then forgot the details and just have a memory that its active directory....
You are born small and you die small. How you are in between is up to you.
-
March 14th, 2003, 10:58 AM
#10
Registered User
I'm sure the AD tweaks are lovely, but all-in-all - does nothing for me or my company.
I think this may be a hard-sell for Microsoft. Their ".NET" plan is so sketchy anyways.
-
March 14th, 2003, 11:13 PM
#11
Registered User
I'm sure the AD tweaks are lovely, but all-in-all - does nothing for me or my company.
I think this may be a hard-sell for Microsoft. Their ".NET" plan is so sketchy anyways.
======================================
"What? dot who? Never heard of it."
-
March 15th, 2003, 05:30 PM
#12
Registered User
Originally posted by nunob
I'm sure the AD tweaks are lovely, but all-in-all - does nothing for me or my company.
I think this may be a hard-sell for Microsoft. Their ".NET" plan is so sketchy anyways.
======================================
"What? dot who? Never heard of it."
Their own web hosting company doesn't use .net yet.
http://news.com.com/2100-1019-992560.html?tag=fd_top
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks