Win2K Vs. Win XP - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Win2K Vs. Win XP

  1. #16
    Registered User gazzak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    3,595
    Quote Originally Posted by arch0nmyc0n
    I've only had 8 blue screens in windows XP where I've had numerous with 2k on the same computers.
    Only 8??? I don't remember having any under W2K so far. I hear the XP blue screens are much better laid out though

  2. #17
    Registered User arch0nmyc0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    It's all relative.
    Posts
    1,820
    Most of my BSOD in XP have been caused by the latest Nvidia drivers being flaky...

  3. #18
    Senior Member Garak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Hebburn, Tyne & Wear, North East England
    Posts
    2,448
    I, as with most other forum members (From what I have read here) have uses for both OS's. I tend to use 2k in office environments, and XP for home users. Although I have been pushing XP Pro into offices recently - simply because I've found myself in a postition where XP Pro is cheaper than 2k Pro.

  4. #19
    Registered User Mr_Miyagi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Westbury, Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    1,099
    Quote Originally Posted by gazzak
    Any O.S. that has tellytubbie land for an opening screen is for the children and can stay in the box. First impressions count with me and that screen tells me it's an O.S. for girls, under 5!!


    EH-HOhhhh....!
    LOVE, TINKYWINKY


    PS
    I thought it was YORKIE that was not for girls!

  5. #20
    Registered User Mr_Miyagi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Westbury, Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    1,099
    Quote Originally Posted by gazzak
    Only 8??? I don't remember having any under W2K so far. I hear the XP blue screens are much better laid out though

    yes, they are very visually appealling. and you get the chance to send a message to MS recycle bin complaining about it, too.

  6. #21
    Registered User ScorpioIlya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Boston MA
    Posts
    256

    2k vs xp

    Windows 2k

    Pros: -Lower hardware requirements
    -More service packs, and a more 'mature' OS
    -Cleaner interface, and less desktop clutter
    -Doesn't decide anything for you

    Cons: -Not quite as secure out of the box
    -Not as good at picking up devices
    -Driver database not as new
    -Given proper hardware, slower
    -Not as stable

    Windows Xp

    Pros: -Stabler
    -Faster boot-up time, and application load times given hardware
    -Comes locked-down well out of the box

    Cons: -$$ to upgrade hardware
    -Funky, stupid interface
    -SLOWER on identical systems
    -Not quite as mature, and only 2 service packs (1, and 1A are 2 right?).
    RCVC (Russian Certified Vodka Drinker), Meathead+

  7. #22
    Registered User arch0nmyc0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    It's all relative.
    Posts
    1,820
    I do agree the "funky, stupid interface" is weird, but it can be altered or turned off so I wouldn't see that as a con. And as for being more mature, sure it was made after 2k. But to be honest, if an OS needs 4 service packs, that's not a particularly good OS. We all know how microsoft works and yeah i realize that's how things work... but I still prefer XP over 2000.... and I've had a chance to mess around with 2003 a bit and it looks better than 2k so far

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •