|
-
January 31st, 2004, 06:52 AM
#16
Registered User
 Originally Posted by arch0nmyc0n
I've only had 8 blue screens in windows XP where I've had numerous with 2k on the same computers.
Only 8??? I don't remember having any under W2K so far. I hear the XP blue screens are much better laid out though
-
February 1st, 2004, 11:53 PM
#17
Registered User
Most of my BSOD in XP have been caused by the latest Nvidia drivers being flaky...
-
February 2nd, 2004, 12:05 AM
#18
Senior Member
I, as with most other forum members (From what I have read here) have uses for both OS's. I tend to use 2k in office environments, and XP for home users. Although I have been pushing XP Pro into offices recently - simply because I've found myself in a postition where XP Pro is cheaper than 2k Pro.
-
February 4th, 2004, 11:03 AM
#19
Registered User
 Originally Posted by gazzak
Any O.S. that has tellytubbie land for an opening screen is for the children and can stay in the box. First impressions count with me and that screen tells me it's an O.S. for girls, under 5!!
EH-HOhhhh....!
LOVE, TINKYWINKY
PS
I thought it was YORKIE that was not for girls!
-
February 4th, 2004, 11:04 AM
#20
Registered User
 Originally Posted by gazzak
Only 8??? I don't remember having any under W2K so far. I hear the XP blue screens are much better laid out though 
yes, they are very visually appealling. and you get the chance to send a message to MS recycle bin complaining about it, too.
-
February 6th, 2004, 09:45 AM
#21
Registered User
2k vs xp
Windows 2k
Pros: -Lower hardware requirements
-More service packs, and a more 'mature' OS
-Cleaner interface, and less desktop clutter
-Doesn't decide anything for you
Cons: -Not quite as secure out of the box
-Not as good at picking up devices
-Driver database not as new
-Given proper hardware, slower
-Not as stable
Windows Xp
Pros: -Stabler
-Faster boot-up time, and application load times given hardware
-Comes locked-down well out of the box
Cons: -$$ to upgrade hardware
-Funky, stupid interface
-SLOWER on identical systems
-Not quite as mature, and only 2 service packs (1, and 1A are 2 right?).
RCVC (Russian Certified Vodka Drinker), Meathead+
-
February 6th, 2004, 10:37 AM
#22
Registered User
I do agree the "funky, stupid interface" is weird, but it can be altered or turned off so I wouldn't see that as a con. And as for being more mature, sure it was made after 2k. But to be honest, if an OS needs 4 service packs, that's not a particularly good OS. We all know how microsoft works and yeah i realize that's how things work... but I still prefer XP over 2000.... and I've had a chance to mess around with 2003 a bit and it looks better than 2k so far
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks