|
-
March 12th, 2004, 01:23 PM
#1
Registered User
-
March 12th, 2004, 01:31 PM
#2
Registered User
I asked myself the same question when I read it.
-
March 12th, 2004, 02:07 PM
#3
Registered User
I asked myself many questions..if fact I am still asking questions..??????????????????????????????????????? ?????
-
March 12th, 2004, 02:09 PM
#4
Registered User
I have the friday vibe going and only 3 hours 'till go home time....somebody 'splain please.
-
March 12th, 2004, 02:38 PM
#5
Registered User
Ummm....
-
March 12th, 2004, 03:13 PM
#6
Flabooble!
It's just not funny. There's the explanation. Writer was trying to make it seem like underclocking those CPU's was the new thing. It's just kind of dumb.
-
March 12th, 2004, 04:07 PM
#7
Most Greaterlyist
I believe this is his punchline.
"After the 300MHz Pentium 4 is introduced, we expect Intel to cut the speeds to perhaps 90MHz or so, and then announce the Pentium IIIs."
-
March 12th, 2004, 04:12 PM
#8
Registered User
 Originally Posted by King Grover
I believe this is his punchline.
"After the 300MHz Pentium 4 is introduced, we expect Intel to cut the speeds to perhaps 90MHz or so, and then announce the Pentium IIIs."
-
March 12th, 2004, 07:17 PM
#9
Registered User
I'd guess that he's making a sarcastic argument against someone unknown who shares this opinion.
-
March 13th, 2004, 04:27 PM
#10
Registered User
I have no idea why this would even seem funny other than the stangeness of it.
-
March 13th, 2004, 08:31 PM
#11
Registered User
It makes about as much sense as 'cold fusion...'
Similar Threads
-
By kato2274 in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 6
Last Post: December 23rd, 2002, 02:16 AM
-
By WebHead in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 6
Last Post: May 17th, 2002, 12:20 PM
-
By aubreypaul in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 27
Last Post: March 16th, 2001, 11:02 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks