|
-
June 3rd, 2004, 11:39 AM
#31
Registered User
 Originally Posted by techs
And remember the people protesting the war wanted to save our soldiers lives. The people who wanted the war to go on wanted our soldiers to fight and die.
I am not saying which side was right but if the protestors had their way you might not have went to Vietnam.
The protesters against Vietnam were different than the ones now. They were against the soldiers, there was a totally different feel to things back then.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 11:45 AM
#32
Registered User
 Originally Posted by edball
The protesters against Vietnam were different than the ones now. They were against the soldiers, there was a totally different feel to things back then.
I only talked about which side would keep the troops safe. And a lot of people really didn't want our troops to die for the cowardly, corrupt south vietnamese. So lets not paint everyone with the brush of a minority of radicals.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 12:00 PM
#33
Registered User
Thanks Tekboy.
I'll tell y'all something and I just want this left in the immediate context of which I'm writing it. I do not have anything against Kerry's involvement with the peace movement after his service during Vietnam. There were many vets who opposed the war.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 12:00 PM
#34
Registered User
 Originally Posted by Tekboy
No, of course not, Cleetus
No, but you should have enough respect to try the links.
"The worst form of intellectual dishonesty is contempt prior to investigation."
The true quote as it was originally given is;
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance- that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -Herbert Spencer
Herbert was an educator.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 12:09 PM
#35
Registered User
 Originally Posted by Major Kong
Thanks Tekboy.
I'll tell y'all something and I just want this left in the immediate context of which I'm writing it. I do not have anything against Kerry's involvement with the peace movement after his service during Vietnam. There were many vets who opposed the war.
Hear, hear! Those were very turbulent times, and for those of you who are too young to remember the joys of draft cards and draft lotteries, all of your knowledge is from someone else, it is not yours. Accordingly I value your opinion.
Ya_K, your military service is an admirable thing, but you don't know what it meant to be young then or the ideals that were both instilled and destroyed. I too served during the vietnam years.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 12:34 PM
#36
Banned
 Originally Posted by Major Kong
Thanks Tekboy.
I'll tell y'all something and I just want this left in the immediate context of which I'm writing it. I do not have anything against Kerry's involvement with the peace movement after his service during Vietnam. There were many vets who opposed the war.
I'll give you that, and I respect that opinion. We all have a constitutional privilege to protest. But this particular protestor of the government policy wants now to become Commander in Chief. There’s a long road to travel from violating articles of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) in an effort for peace, to leading our country’s armed forces. Again I remind you all that Kerry was not permitted by Military regulations to protest. The UCMJ negates many a fighting man’s Constitutional freedoms, and he violated those regulations…bottom line.
I respect the vast differences between my service and the service of those men who lived and died in such completely different times. I count my blessings that I was never subject to a draft, violent war, and despicable lack of appreciation from the home-front. I salute all that served, even Kerry. Don’t ever for a minute think that I don’t take all of that into consideration when I draw my conclusions Jitbob.
-
June 3rd, 2004, 01:09 PM
#37
Registered User
That's why I wrote:
I'll tell y'all something and I just want this left in the immediate context of which I'm writing it...
That in and of itself was the basis of my comment. I was not going to expand on any other issues.
Similar Threads
-
By Ruslan in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 29
Last Post: June 21st, 2004, 04:06 AM
-
By crazyspider in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 7
Last Post: October 27th, 2003, 08:59 AM
-
By Quiet Thunder in forum Networking
Replies: 3
Last Post: November 30th, 2001, 10:40 AM
-
By tgg in forum Windows XP
Replies: 0
Last Post: October 13th, 2001, 09:33 PM
-
By robfromoz in forum Video Adapter/Monitor Drivers
Replies: 3
Last Post: July 16th, 2001, 10:31 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks