Work Yesterday (reason why I was not in)
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Work Yesterday (reason why I was not in)

  1. #1
    Registered User +Daemon+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    RC, Ca
    Posts
    3,406

    Work Yesterday (reason why I was not in)

    Will we had a friendly face come to work yesterday morning around 9:30 AM

    the DA eeeeek!

    well the came in with a warrant searched out servers, computers for about 7 hours and took a couple systems

    why? Dunno they didnt say I wasnt supposed to know, Untill the press came and well I ran inside away from them (they get scary) anywho in the local paper was this incident

    http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/s...d04.580de.html

    and they dont say much on the matter so whats there isa ll I know...

    Investigators search flood control office RIVERSIDE COUNTY: The warrant was triggered by a tip from the Army Corps of Engineers.

    01:28 AM PDT on Wednesday, August 4, 2004

    By LISA O'NEILL HILL, JENNIFER BOWLES and DOUGLAS QUAN / The Press-Enterprise


    Riverside County district attorney's investigators served a search warrant at the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District on Tuesday, about a year after receiving information from the Army Corps of Engineers about possible hazardous material polluting the Santa Ana riverbed, authorities said.

    About 20 investigators went to the flood control office in Riverside about 9:30 a.m. and spent the day collecting and reviewing documents and records, Riverside County Chief Deputy District Attorney Creg Datig said.

    Datig said he could not specify what hazardous material may have been involved but said, "It's not a situation where life or limb is currently jeopardized."

    Datig said investigators were looking for records or documentation that would give them information about potential exposure in the river or flood control channels.

    "We proceeded to conduct an investigation, which is ongoing and in an effort to determine the nature and extent of possible exposure as well as whether there may be exposure elsewhere in the county, we today served a search warrant at the flood control district and received the full cooperation of management," he said.

    Dusty Williams, the general manager and chief engineer of the district, said he did not know what authorities were looking for, but said it appeared investigators were interested in "environmental hazards." Investigators had a warrant to search all seven buildings at flood control headquarters on Market Street, said Williams.

    Williams said he got a call last week from an investigator asking to set up an appointment. The investigators took files, downloaded information from servers and took at least one computer, Williams said.

    "If there are problems, we want to correct them," Williams said. "I wish we knew more."

    "If there are hazardous materials, we need to get them out for water quality purposes and move on correcting whatever the problem is," Williams said.

    The Santa Ana River is the main artery of the Inland area's watershed and provides water to 5 million people in Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange Counties.

    Supervisor Marion Ashley said he was told that the district attorney's office was interested in a barricade on Main Street along the Santa Ana River levy that is made of large hydraulic cylinders.

    "It's possible those cylinders still contain hydraulic fluid that could leak into the river and cause ground water problems. That's one of the things I've heard," he said. He said the flood control district did not know who authorized or conducted the work.

    Greg Fuderer, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Los Angeles, declined to comment on the investigation.

    The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, which monitors and regulates pollution on the river, wasn't aware of the investigation, said Kurt Berchtold, the board's assistant executive officer.

    Datig said it was difficult to say how long the investigation might take.

    "What we're talking about is a review of records dating back anywhere from five to 10 years in some cases, certainly dating back at least six years. That's a lot of stuff to go through. ... Certainly, it will be a matter of weeks, perhaps months before we're able to analyze" it, he said.

    "We're not exactly sure what situation we have here. It could be a situation where certain procedures and processes need to be reviewed but we will discover that once we go through the stuff," Datig said.

    County spokesman Raymond Smith said the county has been working with the district attorney's office and will continue to cooperate. He said if something had happened, the county wanted to know how and why it had happened and takes steps to prevent it from reoccurring.

    More than 200 employees work at the Riverside County Flood Control District. Many of them are engineers who work on dams, storm drains, channels and levees.





  2. #2
    Registered User edball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,884
    I thought you meant Damned Angel (DA).

  3. #3
    Banned Ya_know's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,692
    That's cool! Did you put up a struggle, or did you let them in without a fight?

    That would be fun...not worth getting arrested over, but start giving them crap about their warrant not being recognized by your office as binding.

    "I am Saddam Husane, President of Iraq...I do not recognize this court!"

  4. #4
    Registered User Damned Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB
    Posts
    2,583
    Quote Originally Posted by edball
    I thought you meant Damned Angel (DA).
    I thought that too at first, but then I remembered that yesterday was my first day back at work since my vacation.

  5. #5
    Registered User Spork's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    1,221
    Did you remember to remove the midget pr0n files from the server before they took it?

  6. #6
    Registered User Major Kong's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Home: Eagle River, Alaska Work: Chukchi Sea Alaska
    Posts
    2,832
    Welcome to my world +Daemon+ I have actually went through 3 of these events, but they were the DOJ not local. If only ¼ of the local report is true you can be expecting more visits from the State and the Feds.

    Funny though that doesn't sound much like the Army Corps of Engineers I've dealt with over the last 25 years. Usually if they have a burr up their arse they will come right out and tell ya, and make darn sure everybody knows about it. I rekkin' the California ACE folks are more the silent type than their Alaska, Arizona, Tennessee and Virginia counterparts.
    I only post using 100% recycled electrons!!!

    Stay on the bomb run, boys. I'm going to get them doors open if it hair lips everybody on Bear Creek.

  7. #7
    Registered User +Daemon+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    RC, Ca
    Posts
    3,406
    they said there will be there for 2 hours and ended up to be 7 hours, they jacked 3 of our systems and I guess lots of email :/ dunno, I just played poker and thats about it. We were not told anything so we are still in the blue

  8. #8
    Registered User Tekboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,492
    Sounds to me like an awfully expensive way to get things done; that is, investigating through the District Attorney's office.

    It really sounds more like they are going after somene's reputation/job, rather than any real dangerous public situation.

    Man, I hate beaurocrats!

  9. #9
    Driver Terrier NooNoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    31,824
    Why take 3 whole computers? Why not just take the drives? Oh wait... was the DA's IT budget cut this year by chance?

  10. #10
    Registered User +Daemon+'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    RC, Ca
    Posts
    3,406
    ahhahaha ya they had hard drives and were coping them but some of the machines they took ran win 3.1

    maybe they didnt know how to use dos/win 3.1????

    anywho I have a ghost boot disc we were using to ghost some old images on some machines for them, well my boot disc bots windows xp pro off the cd and goes into windows like enviroment and loads ghost 8 (win32 bit version) they wanted to know hwo it was done and if they could get a copy (umm ya we will give u a copy when pigs fly)

    I mean we have software on the disc we paid for and the DA didnt care :/ he was like come on no one will know just make a copy etc.. etc.. and here at my work we are really strict on pirated software..


    seems to me the DA is getting alot of P.Software, wonder if m$ knows about this or maybe they do and m$ get bigger pockets over this dunno

  11. #11
    Flabooble! ilovetheusers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Downtown Banglaboobia
    Posts
    6,403
    Maybe he wants a personal copy for his home. A lot of folks (not the software maker) don't consider things piracy until they begin selling things that they made with the pirated software.


    Anyway, hope things turn out well for everyone and there's no toxic chemicals for real.

Similar Threads

  1. need a reason to go to work in the morning?
    By Damned Angel in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: October 17th, 2003, 12:58 PM
  2. Did this PC work yesterday?
    By ClickHere2Surf.com in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 20th, 2002, 03:02 PM
  3. Called off work WHoooo Hoooo ...Warning..Ranting here
    By Morticia Addams in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 27th, 2001, 01:41 PM
  4. Favorite Quotes? famous or infamous
    By NeuromancerIV in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: May 12th, 2001, 07:49 AM
  5. [RESOLVED] W2K SP2??
    By Bjorn in forum Windows NT/2000
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 17th, 2001, 12:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •