OK I got me a tax question for y'all...
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: OK I got me a tax question for y'all...

  1. #1
    Registered User Major Kong's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Home: Eagle River, Alaska Work: Chukchi Sea Alaska
    Posts
    2,832

    OK I got me a tax question for y'all...

    This has been a bone of contention with me for many, many years. For one I've seen it as a major abuse and it now becoming a front page issue in Anchorage. In my Virginia days I had/have first hand knowledge of the freakin' abuse. The question is more local oriented towards property tax and that is the exempt status that churches enjoy in most areas of the US.

    My "beef", so to speak, is the abuse of this system. Don't get me wrong a church, synagog, chapel, mosque, temple, etc. and the grounds should be exempt, BUT a 5 acre lot downtown that the church owns but does not use does not qualify for the exemption and should be subject to the same levy as everybody else! No Exceptions Period! The same applies for that 10 acre lot out at the lake, or by the seashore, that the church owns and once a year for a week it's used for Vacation Bible Camp, but for the rest of the time it's a nice lot used for purposes that have nothing to do with church activities. Nope your paying the same taxes as John Q. Public!

    And don't even get me started on not for profit organizations!
    I only post using 100% recycled electrons!!!

    Stay on the bomb run, boys. I'm going to get them doors open if it hair lips everybody on Bear Creek.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    8,442
    I am right there with ya

  3. #3
    Registered User hudsonsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,276
    I agree with you 100%, and from what I know the law does as well. The issue appears to be one of enforcement. For what its worth, one of the largest property owners in New York City is Trinity Church. They pay real estate tax on their holdings.

  4. #4
    Registered User edball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,884
    I concur.

  5. #5
    Registered User Wayward Clam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    the depths of Lake Superior
    Posts
    3,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Major Kong
    And don't even get me started on not for profit organizations!
    As a member of several not-for-profit organizations, I am VERY curious to see why I shouldn't get you started on them...

  6. #6
    Registered User Major Kong's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Home: Eagle River, Alaska Work: Chukchi Sea Alaska
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Wayward Clam
    As a member of several not-for-profit organizations, I am VERY curious to see why I shouldn't get you started on them...
    Something exact rules apply, but in my for instance I'm thinking more along the lines of NP's such as what Blue Cross/Blue Shield was trying to pull in Washington and Alaska.

  7. #7
    Registered User Wayward Clam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    the depths of Lake Superior
    Posts
    3,778
    Ah. Well, I'll be the first to admit I have no idea what you're talking about. What's the story?

  8. #8
    Registered User techs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    In one of the really, really Blue states.
    Posts
    5,159
    I think that they should be partially tax exempt. For example they should pay property tax or other tax equal to the amount of services they receive. For example the fire department will come put out a fire yet they don't pay for that service. If they don't pay any taxes at all and receive government services they are being funded by the government and the people of this country.

  9. #9
    Registered User Jediab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    New Hope, MN, USA
    Posts
    768
    If you tax a church, then there goes the seperation of church and state. If they pay taxes of any sort, then they will have the right to have official lobbyists to protect their interests.
    Last edited by Jediab; August 4th, 2004 at 09:27 PM.

  10. #10
    Registered User imaeditedbysowulo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    columbus, oh
    Posts
    2,184
    Would it be ok for a church to own things like apartment complexes? I heard that one specific church denomination owned dozens of apartment complexes around my city, but have no idea if that's true or not. I've been kinda curious ever since.

  11. #11
    Registered User techs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    In one of the really, really Blue states.
    Posts
    5,159
    I just thought about this. Don't not-for-profits pay things like property taxes? They don't pay for things like sales tax and any profits are non-taxable? Isn't it only religious groups that don't pay?

  12. #12
    Registered User geoscomp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,340
    This may have a bearing on the problem:

    from a recent Forbes article

    Since its early days, the Christian church has been one of the largest landowners in the world. This property traditionally includes not just churches and related structures, such as convents, bishops' palaces and schools, but also non-related structures and real estate.
    Similar to charities and most nonprofit organizations, churches are tax-exempt, which means that unlike other residential landowners, they are not required to pay property taxes on their many mansions, retreats or land parcels. That doesn't apply, however, to commercial property not used for church purposes, nor does it apply to income that may be generated by commercial property (unless that income is used for church purposes, it gets taxed).


    Even dioceses that aren't in as much legal and financial trouble are sitting on large piles of real estate. The Archdiocese of Miami, for example, owns the titles to more than 100 pieces of property and has established several nonprofit real estate companies to manage the properties. Mary Ross Agosta, a spokeswoman for the Archdiocese of Miami, tells this anecdote: "In 1958, when the Archdiocese of Miami was first created, the Bishop [Coleman F. Carroll] would literally get into a small plane, fly around the state and say, 'We need to buy land there and there,' depending on where he felt the population would grow." (Agosta adds, however, that many of those properties are schools, nursing homes and so forth.)

    Similarly, the Archdiocese of Providence in Rhode Island reportedly operates more than 220 corporate subsidiaries and $44 million worth of real estate, including the Aldrich Mansion, where the Brad Pitt movie Meet Joe Black was filmed. The Aldrich Mansion, built in 1896, sits on 75 acres on Narragansett Bay and was the setting for Abby Aldrich's 1901 wedding to John D. Rockefeller Jr.

    In May, Cardinal Francis George of the Archdiocese of Chicago publicly said he might consider selling his mansion, a luxurious brick estate located in the upscale Gold Coast neighborhood, in order to raise funds to help pay for sex abuse lawsuits. The well-preserved property, built in 1885, is said to be worth well over $10 million, and it includes large landscaped gardens, 19 chimneys and a coach house, and has two entry facades. An archdiocese spokesman says the cardinal was just expressing his wish for a simple life and was not serious about actually selling the property.

  13. #13
    Registered User hudsonsmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,276
    Not sure exactly where the line is drawn, but non-profits and certain not-for-profits don't pay real estate taxes, at least in New York. (I believe this is a matter of local law). Property has to be used by the entity for an exemptible purpose - they can't rent it out or run a for-profit business.

    ima - churches can own investment property (like apartment complexes) but generally must pay property taxes.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    8,442
    Quote Originally Posted by geoscomp
    This may have a bearing on the problem:

    from a recent Forbes article
    I say tax the **** out of them

  15. #15
    Registered User techs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    In one of the really, really Blue states.
    Posts
    5,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Cleetus
    I say tax the **** out of them
    Tax'em all. Let the IRS sort'em out.

Similar Threads

  1. [RESOLVED] 70-240: LETS DO THIS!!
    By 70-240 in forum Certification
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: February 20th, 2012, 03:35 AM
  2. Why we should tax the rich more.
    By techs in forum Politicos
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: August 6th, 2004, 10:24 AM
  3. We can all agree on a tax on imported oil.
    By techs in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 7th, 2004, 09:33 AM
  4. Dangerous Submersive Reporting For Lynching
    By Wayward Clam in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
    Replies: 187
    Last Post: April 24th, 2003, 01:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •