[RESOLVED] Windows 98se & memory
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: [RESOLVED] Windows 98se & memory

  1. #1
    PoweredByNA
    Guest

    Post Windows 98se & memory

    I have been reading all posts for quite awhile and I am a little baffled .

    What is the max memory of PC133 I can use with Windows 98se & why would they make motherboards that have a max of 1 or 2gig SDRAM if windows has a max???
    Please help me , I want to go buy some more memory just so I can get peak performance out of my AZ11e motherboard with the 1000mhz ATHLON overclocked to 1200mhz with 384mb PC100 SDRAM , my FIC AZ11e will take PC100 or PC133........

    <To obtain knowledge , one has to remain teachable>

    [This message has been edited by PoweredByNA (edited February 24, 2001).]

    [This message has been edited by PoweredByNA (edited February 24, 2001).]

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    River Falls, WI
    Posts
    2,433

    Post

    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by PoweredByNA:
    I have been reading all posts for quite awhile and I am a little baffled .

    What is the max memory of PC133 I can use with Windows 98se & why would they make motherboards that have a max of 1 or 2gig SDRAM if windows has a max???
    Please help me , I want to go buy some more memory just so I can get peak performance out of my AZ11e motherboard with the 1000mhz ATHLON overclocked to 1200mhz with 384mb PC100 SDRAM , my FIC AZ11e will take PC100 or PC133........

    <To obtain knowledge , one has to remain teachable>

    [This message has been edited by PoweredByNA (edited February 24, 2001).]

    [This message has been edited by PoweredByNA (edited February 24, 2001).]
    </font>

    Win9x uses up to 512mb of ram, but they make boards that use more because NT and 2000 can use more. I am not sure what the max is for NT and 2000. I am also not sure what Whistler will handle when it comes out, but the window is open.


    ------------------
    You spend your whole life believing that you're on the right track,
    only to discover that you're on the wrong train.

    Dale Earnhardt #3 (1951-2001)
    You will be missed!

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,515

    Post

    I believe that NT 4.0 has a 4gb limit and 2000 something like a terabyte (BIG).

    ------------------
    Death is lighter than a feather - duty heavier than a mountian.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Clackamas, OR USA
    Posts
    5,422

    Post

    Not to mention (and I dread to bring it up-- heh, heh) there ARE other OS's out there....

    ------------------
    Ya never know, ya know?

  5. #5
    evilcabbage
    Guest

    Post

    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by sowulo:
    Not to mention (and I dread to bring it up-- heh, heh) there ARE other OS's out there....

    </font>
    took the words right out of my mouth. I dont think there are memory limits on unix/linux flavoured OS's, are there? ... we shant mention BEOS (*shudder*), or OS2/warp.



    ------------------
    Its like shooting fish in a barrel, in the head, at point blank range, with an elephant gun.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •