[RESOLVED] Explorer cause GPF in User.exe HELP
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: [RESOLVED] Explorer cause GPF in User.exe HELP

  1. #1
    QTtech
    Guest

    Resolved [RESOLVED] Explorer cause GPF in User.exe HELP

    I have a computer running a PCChips M585LMR Motherboard and an AMD K6-2 333 MHz Processor. I have installed Windows 98 SE and Windows 95b each about 5 times on this system... Everytime I install Win98SE on it it gives me this message while running Win98 - Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module user.exe at 0007:00007070 I am getting very angry! I have tried different drivers, disabeling devices, installing patches, and many other things that I can't remember. I have search for online support and found NONE. I need your help.

    More system info...
    Integrated 56K PCtel Modem
    Integrated CMI Sound Pro Media (CM8738)
    Integrated DaviCom Network Card
    Integrated VIA PCI/AGP 8 MB Video
    It has 1 PC66-32MB SDRAM chip in it
    Fujitsu 4.3 GM HDD
    CyberDrive 48X CD-ROM

    any other infor needed let me know please.

    ------------------
    QuickTel Tech - [email protected]

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 1998
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    376

    Post

    I've intalled 95b with the same board/cpu. there's a trick. UNDERCLOCK the system down to about 200 for the installation. Then install the AMD k6 patch for windows 95. Shutdown and set the clock speed where it should be.

    You should actually be able to overclock it if you want to once you have the patch installed.

    Never tried 98.

    Good luck
    Bruce Dunn

  3. #3
    bohr
    Guest

    Exclamation

    UH, Bdunn?
    That amd k62 patch is for amds running at 350 MHZ or faster under WIN95 osr2.0 to 2.5.
    I'd have to say it's that pcchips board.
    They are crap boards with approx. 50-50 success rate and very buggy with 95 or 98.
    I'm never touching those boards again!!!!

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 1998
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    376

    Post

    The patch was designed for chips running at 350 or faster. the issue it resolves actually occurs with all AMD CPUs but most frequently with the faster ones and also more frequently on certain boards. I've used the same combination and underclocking works to get it setup.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •