|
-
December 7th, 2004, 02:25 PM
#1
Registered User
Limiting bandwidth
I'm looking into this now but here's what I want to achieve.
Scenario: Small office, 6 people, 1 workgroup. Windows 2000 server acts as DHCP and DNS server, also as a router to the internet. They have a 4mbps connection to the internet.
Problem: When someone starts a big download or downloads a big e-mail attachment they seem to take most of the 4mbps intrernet connection and everyone else crawls along. I can find no way of overcoming this....so far!
Solution? I really want to limit a users bandwidth so that everyone has a fair share. Is there any known way of doing this or software that can help do this by mac address for example?
Any suggestions welcomed...
There's no panic like the panic you momentarily feel when you've got
your hand or head stuck in something
-
December 7th, 2004, 03:53 PM
#2
Registered User
Hit them on the back of the head with a ruler?
-
December 7th, 2004, 04:57 PM
#3
Registered User
 Originally Posted by iceman
Hit them on the back of the head with a ruler?
Can you please keep the padding **** in the lounge.
-
December 7th, 2004, 04:59 PM
#4
Registered User
Really not padding, just some humor on a slow day!
-
December 7th, 2004, 06:04 PM
#5
Registered User
-
December 7th, 2004, 06:07 PM
#6
Registered User
We've used this...I have no complaints about it.
http://www.bandwidthcontroller.com/features.html
And it has a free trial to see if you like it...
-
December 8th, 2004, 10:28 AM
#7
Registered User
I was on IRC some time ago and heard of some H/W devices that do what you want gazzak, cant remember the names though.
-
December 10th, 2004, 12:43 PM
#8
Registered User
would not happen to be Windows 2000 small business server edition would it? if so it would come with ISA server which would do this for you (besides firewalling)
-
December 10th, 2004, 01:15 PM
#9
Avatar Goes Here
You could use linux and a program that I believe is called shaper or bandwidth shaper or something like that
-
December 10th, 2004, 01:18 PM
#10
Registered User
smoothwall in web proxy mode can set max upload and download limits.
alternatively, setting up QoS on the server would do it, and that wouldnt require buying anything new. thats the option i'd go for.
-
December 11th, 2004, 10:27 AM
#11
Registered User
 Originally Posted by IT Len
That software looks pretty good. Do you need to buy just one for the server or a copy for each computer? (can't find that out on their site?)
-
December 11th, 2004, 01:23 PM
#12
Geezer
I've used this Netlimter before sucessfully (free trial available somewhere off that link ), but if you don't want to cripple a machine running this & controlling it (happens with all load balancing software to some extent or other with busy connections) then you want an appliance to do it - a load balancing router - random google by way of example or you can figure out how Network Load Balancing works in w2k with clusters but I think that's got to be done with a domain structure - not really my 'thing' so it'd be nice if one of the ' M$ network dudes' we have hanging about can 'expand' on this ?
-
December 12th, 2004, 09:02 AM
#13
Registered User
 Originally Posted by techs
That software looks pretty good. Do you need to buy just one for the server or a copy for each computer? (can't find that out on their site?)
Just one copy for the server...I believe it's around 50 bucks US$. BTW, processor overhead is negligible...if even noticeable. Three things about it we like most...the ability to throttle down different types of Inet activity[browsing, downloads, VOIP], set and really fine-tune standard bandwidth per user dependent on priority of user, and the interface is very handy.
-
December 12th, 2004, 09:07 AM
#14
Geezer
 Originally Posted by IT Len
..BTW, processor overhead is negligible...if even noticeable. Three things about it we like most...
Its not that I was on about (I was less than clear!) .. I'm on about the delay it has to create to validate whether all the different packets are within or without quota, if you've got lots of connections all this backs up to quite a size & can be a strain on any machine running it - but when I was typing I was thinking like 100+ concurrent connections - here we have 6 !
-
December 13th, 2004, 07:07 AM
#15
Registered User
all these applications are at the end of the day is fancy front-ends for QoS. if you dont mind a little learning you can configure it yourself and save yourself the $50...
Similar Threads
-
By pinhead in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 7
Last Post: July 10th, 2003, 02:49 PM
-
By belf in forum Windows XP
Replies: 7
Last Post: June 18th, 2003, 10:48 AM
-
By tk421 in forum Networking
Replies: 1
Last Post: November 24th, 2002, 01:46 PM
-
By Saber99 in forum Windows NT/2000
Replies: 0
Last Post: November 13th, 2001, 10:25 AM
-
By Joker1 in forum Tech Lounge & Tales
Replies: 20
Last Post: June 17th, 2001, 12:24 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks