PCI Latency Timer
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: PCI Latency Timer

  1. #1
    Registered User tysfamily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northeast Indiana
    Posts
    2

    Question PCI Latency Timer

    In CMOS of my new MSI MB and ASUS MB it have the PCI Latency Timing set at 64 , but I'm sure that my older computers are set at 32. I'm not sure of this one, what should this should be set at? I'm running Windows 98SE and my VGA cards for these computers are PNY FX5600 Ultra DirectX 9C and ATI 9700Pro DirectX9C. I don't want to Overclock I just don't want the system to crash or lockup. I've had major probulm with the VGA crashes in the MSI 865PE Neo2-PFS Platinum Edition and the SOYO SY-KT600 DRAGON Plus. Any help would be great, thank you for your time.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    68
    Normally, the PCI Latency Timer is set to 32 cycles on most machines. (but this varies depending on the manufacturer of the board) This means the active PCI device has to complete its transactions within 32 clock cycles or hand it over to the next PCI device.

    For better PCI performance, a longer latency should be used. Try increasing it to 64 cycles or even 128 cycles. The optimal value for every system is different. You should benchmark your PCI cards' performance after each change to determine the optimal PCI latency time for your system.

    But you need to remember that a longer PCI latency isn't necessarily better. A long latenc can also reduce performance as the other PCI devices queuing up may be stalled for too long. This is especially true with systems with many PCI devices or PCI devices that continuously write short bursts of data to the PCI bus. Such systems would work better with shorter PCI latencies as they allow rapid access to the PCI bus.

    In addition, some time-critical PCI devices may not agree with a long latency. Such devices require priority access to the PCI bus which may not be possible if the PCI bus is held up by another device for a long period. In such cases, it is recommended that you keep to the default PCI latency.

Similar Threads

  1. USB Mass Storage Device Not Recognized (XP)
    By SpazTAstic in forum USB/Firewire
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: October 12th, 2007, 10:01 AM
  2. PCI slot and card versions (Should I even worry?)
    By FridayAvenger in forum Tech-To-Tech
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 23rd, 2003, 11:34 PM
  3. ok.... ive had it with this radeon
    By fst1006 in forum Tech-To-Tech
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: September 19th, 2002, 06:20 PM
  4. [RESOLVED] How do i change IRQ settings in WinME,or should I?
    By Kamadaki in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 20th, 2001, 07:36 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 28th, 2000, 06:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •