|
-
January 11th, 2006, 04:34 AM
#2
Geezer
I've got folks using xp, who won't adopt sp1 ! Never mind sp2 ..
Personally I'm of the 'update it always immediately' line of thought .. but being confus-ed & all, this also means, I can (when the fancy takes me) switch tack, & say that firms who've done sufficient testing & have adequate 'insulation' from the outside world, might well be better if they have really complex systems, sitting tight on updates until they can estimate the effect of any changes on their greater system ...
(but for folks at home, this is not generally a good idea, unless you have a security expert & a big fat team of system admins to make sure no 'strangeness' is affecting any particular system - lots of 'really big firms' have policy regarding this, which is to the effect of 'test it first' )
Similar Threads
-
By bfravel in forum Windows Server 2003 & Windows Home Server
Replies: 1
Last Post: November 28th, 2005, 07:00 PM
-
By Yothar in forum Windows XP
Replies: 1
Last Post: September 7th, 2005, 02:52 AM
-
By paul.rowling in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 6
Last Post: May 5th, 2005, 07:28 AM
-
By 3M in forum Windows XP
Replies: 2
Last Post: August 5th, 2002, 10:03 AM
-
By longjos in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 3
Last Post: August 29th, 2000, 06:56 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks